Amazing multiple eyeball from the depth - for your eyes only

frogmaster-riviera

Bronze Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
1,114
Reaction score
1,151
Golden Thread
2
Location
Greece, French Riviera, Switzerland, North Italy
🥇 Banner finds
2
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Detector(s) used
CTX 3030, Excalibur IIS, Sea Hunter MK II, Ebinger Seacon, Quest Pro, XP Deus, Deteknix Quest Pro, Makro Pointer, Xpointer diver & Wader
Primary Interest:
Other
Hi guys,

Can't say a lot.... but I can show some photos... shot with my new camera from a depth between 300 and 350ft. We use CCR (Close Circuit Rebreather) with constant PP0² and Trimix. We try to remain "light" (carry less tanks with us) so we prefer to use a high Partial Oxygen Pressure (PP0²) in this scenario during peak depth (about 1.5 bar = 21PSI ) to avoid a higher pourcentage of Helium in our gas mix, which will result in a longer deco time. Our narcosis equivalence is around 170/180ft down with air (we are well trained and used to dive with air down 200ft every week)

These are poteries called "Amphora" used Before Christ for wine and olive oil transportation. Certainly grec for sure.

Those pictures shows the complete poteries, one of my banner finds was only a part of it : http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/beach-shallow-water/490097-unusual-find-morning-120ft-depth-30-bc-find-during-scuba-detection.html#post4842937

Without metal detector due to state regulations..and depth! We can't stay that much time down there... each minute spent at this depth = x10 minute of deco time (28' on site = almost 5h of deco time) .... and there is so many eyeballs to enjoy before feeling the need to use MD! ....
... this are only for the Thinnest US Treasure Hunters... and I know you are a lot ;-)

766227divearcheo1.jpg

771688divearcheo2.jpg

988094divearcheo4.jpg

201369divearcheo5.jpg



Hope you will enjoy ;-)

Sample of partial pottery recovered on an other site
282411amphora5.jpg



A little movie shot between christmas and new year ...

 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
:icon_thumright:...............:notworthy:
 

Just sitting there. Man that's awesome! :occasion14: maybe one of my Greek relatives dropped that there ;)
 

Just sitting there. Man that's awesome! :occasion14: maybe one of my Greek relatives dropped that there ;)

You wouldn't be there... it is not just a drop ... it's a wreck for sure :laughing9:
 

Last edited:
What is the general location?
 

Last edited:
Incredible congratulations
 

Hi Casper!

I'm always fan of your post even if I don't always comment.. all the best for 2017!
 

Wow Frog... Spectacular.

Um... THIS IS A BANNER FIND !

Love to see this up there... lets see.
 

PS> PLEASE keep some photos coming... and updates.

Will follow this for sure.
 

Wow Frog... Spectacular.

Um... THIS IS A BANNER FIND !

Love to see this up there... lets see.

Thanks AARC and most important, wish you all the best for this new year. Always a pleasure to follow you ;-)

FM, from the Med Sea
 

Last edited:
Wow Frog... Spectacular.

Um... THIS IS A BANNER FIND !

Love to see this up there... lets see.


From a Moderator point of view it can't be nominated for BANNER It is NOT considered as a find and it is not fresh enough.

For me, this site discovery IS A FIND
This dive was done between Christmas and New year 2016. A bit less then 2 weeks later is considered as too late :laughing9:

Comparing to the 21 centuries of this site.. everybody don't count the same way.
 

That is just plain AWESOME frog!!!!!!!! I use to dive a lil when I was stationed in Cuba, Thgt 45' of water was alot, couldn't image 300'......... Your new camera works GREAT too.. CONGRATZ....
 

From a Moderator point of view it can't be nominated for BANNER It is NOT considered as a find and it is not fresh enough.

For me, this site discovery IS A FIND
This dive was done between Christmas and New year 2016. A bit less then 2 weeks later is considered as too late :laughing9:

Comparing to the 21 centuries of this site.. everybody don't count the same way.

Sorry, but taking a picture of something found, the picture itself does not qualify for banner. If I found 2000 year old pottery bowl in a cave in new Mexico and took a picture of it it and left the bowl in the cave the picture of it would not qualify for banner.

As far as the "not fresh enough" that would apply to making a thread in "today's finds" forum for something found weeks ago. Only way it would qualify is if someone had not been on line to post the find for that time period.

Your post violates our rules, if a member has an issue with rules or rulings by mod it is to be handled via pm with mod, not in our open forums.
 

Last edited:
Sorry, but taking a picture of something found, the picture itself does not qualify for banner. If I found 2000 year old pottery bowl in a cave in new Mexico and took a picture of it it and left the bowl in the cave the picture of it would not qualify for banner. As far as the "not fresh enough" that would apply to making a thread in "today's finds" forum. Only way it would qualify is if someone had not been on line to post for that time period.

You are not aware of overseas regulation I suppose. If I show you a pic of something from that site on surface or even with my hand on it..I doubt that the patriot act and the US secrecy will cover me a lot.

Finding a site like that IS a FIND by itself, no doubt about it. Original founder of TNET meat me a few years ago and could tell you we are Treasure Hunter ;-)

Next time I'll post some coins from my local beach....:icon_scratch:
 

Last edited:
You are not aware of overseas regulation I suppose. If I show you a pic of something from that site on surface or even with my hand on it..I doubt that the patriot act and the US secrecy will cover me a lot.

Finding a site like that IS a FIND by itself, no doubt about it. Original founder of TNET meat me a few years ago and could tell you we are Treasure Hunter ;-)

Next time I'll post some coins from my local beach....:icon_scratch:

Laws do not change fact it doesn't qualify for banner, no one disputes your treasure hunter, that doesn't change the fact the picture does not qualify for banner.
 

FM,

Great discovery and you should be proud of it....you followed the local laws to a T since the site and finds no doubt would be considered treasure and not to be disturbed by unauthorized people.

It's treasure in my books and thanks for sharing.

Regards + HH

Bill
 

From a Moderator point of view it can't be nominated for BANNER It is NOT considered as a find and it is not fresh enough.

For me, this site discovery IS A FIND
This dive was done between Christmas and New year 2016. A bit less then 2 weeks later is considered as too late :laughing9:

Comparing to the 21 centuries of this site.. everybody don't count the same way.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Frog... lets ask this question... "did you FIND this item" ? ? ?

IF the answer is YES... then This IS A BANNER. IMO.

Firstly... NOT ONLY is this A BANNER "find" IMO... This is a banner of banners when it comes to "a found item" ... ALSO IMO.

Secondly... This not only qualifies as / for BANNER... It surpasses it.

Vote stands.

BANNER > !
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom