To my mind it is all a matter of perspective.
In the agricultural world that I was raised in things were mostly divided between green loyalties and red loyalties. A scant few favored other colors (blue, yellow, orange, red/gray) but the vast majority chose either green or red.
Green was the most popular of the two major colors. Feature for feature, it was also the most expensive – often by quite a large amount.
Those with green loyalties cited dealer support, resell value, and brand favoritism as rock-solid reasons for their purchasing decisions.
Those with red loyalties cited dealer support, lower costs, bang for the buck, and brand favoritism as rock-solid reasons for their purchasing decisions.
Those with loyalties to the other colors cited much lower prices, bang for the buck, and disgust with the two major players as rock-solid reasons for their purchasing decisions.
I don’t know that any of the choices were wrong – or right. I’ve used all of those colors and found that I had likes/dislikes with each.
Green certainly had some legitimate justifications for the increased cost.
Red was different, but got the job done at a smaller cost.
We ended up using most orange and/or blue – but there were some concessions that had to be made (dealer support and parts availability).
In the end the crops got planted, cared for, and ultimately harvested. The tools used were chosen as a matter of perspective – and the value of that choice was raised/lowered in accordance to what was delivered, for what was paid.
Most people felt the return from Green was well worth the extra cost – making Green (in their mind anyway) a much better value.