celestina44
Jr. Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2016
- Messages
- 43
- Reaction score
- 15
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Deming, NM
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
Upvote
0
I'm not saying it's north American Indian artifact. Simple enough
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Trying to steer the op in the right direction mod..
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Just goes to show what you know. That's the work of a jesuit. You can stick to the points that doesnt take an education. This kind of stuff is to advance for you. It don't bother me a bit you can't see it.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Your trying to steer inexperienced members in the wrong direction, as stated this is the North American Indian Artifact Forum, let's keep fantasy out of it.Trying to steer the op in the right direction mod..
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
You are unable to distinguish marks on a rock that are natural from marks on a rock that are man made. It's very obvious, as you have made these claims on other threads, and with other rocks, as well. You are very, very mistaken. Unfortunately, from your tone, it's also obvious that you will never be able to accept the fact that you are mistaken. It's not a question of your understanding being too advanced for anyone here. You need to learn how to tell when marks on rocks have been rendered by human beings. Until you do, you will not know as much as people who are able to make that distinction. Although you are unaware of it, all you are doing is advertising your lack of knowledge. You have a great deal to learn if you think for one second that the rock you posted has any man made marks upon it. It does not. Trying to impose your complete lack of knowledge upon experienced eyes by telling those people that your knowledge and understanding is somehow more advanced is just plain foolish. It's also extremely arrogant, since you are basically announcing that you have nothing whatsoever to learn. Wrong. You have a lot to learn if you are ever going to grow beyond the very silly claims you are making.
You are unable to distinguish marks on a rock that are natural from marks on a rock that are man made. It's very obvious, as you have made these claims on other threads, and with other rocks, as well. You are very, very mistaken. Unfortunately, from your tone, it's also obvious that you will never be able to accept the fact that you are mistaken. It's not a question of your understanding being too advanced for anyone here. You need to learn how to tell when marks on rocks have been rendered by human beings. Until you do, you will not know as much as people who are able to make that distinction. Although you are unaware of it, all you are doing is advertising your lack of knowledge. You have a great deal to learn if you think for one second that the rock you posted has any man made marks upon it. It does not. Trying to impose your complete lack of knowledge upon experienced eyes by telling those people that your knowledge and understanding is somehow more advanced is just plain foolish. It's also extremely arrogant, since you are basically announcing that you have nothing whatsoever to learn. Wrong. You have a lot to learn if you are ever going to grow beyond the very silly claims you are making.
I say, I say, Boy! You need to listen to me when I'm taken too you.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Bob, stop posting rocks in the Indian artifact forum....If you can't tell from this one. You need to see an eye Dr.![]()
![]()
The joke is on you guy[emoji23]
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
How in the world is that Jesuit? Did you find it? Was it given to you?Yeah you probably think this is too.![]()
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Mod. Pm me please. Got a question for you. That is an artifact but sure .I tired of the short bus gang anyway
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk