AT Gold vs Fisher Gold Bug Pro

Treasure finder

Sr. Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
464
Reaction score
62
Golden Thread
0
Location
Los Angeles
Detector(s) used
Garrett Infinium, Compass Gold Scanner, Maxi Pulse, Gardner with a 3 foot loop, PDF1000, & Dowsing rods,
I vote for the Fisher just because I can't stand the way the AT Gold chatters and burps! :occasion14:
 

Fisher wins this race hands down on sensitivity and stability. (UNLESS) you're using the 4.5" sniper coil on the AT.. Even so the AT falls behind... (Not saying its a bad detector) I enjoy mine..
The AT has ground balance window option great for really hot ground..

What i know: Time spent hunting nuggets with both machines would be about 60% fisher 40% AT (a few months ago) Found a lot more gold with the fisher than I did the AT Gold..
 

There's nothing better than asking users for their opinions and getting great answers.
Thanks guys.
Rich
 

well I've had a g-2 which is a fisher gold pro in pistol grip configuiration and here's my take like both machines but I think the fisher would have the edge in picking in the iron vs the garret but the garrett will go deeper and on deep targets sounds shallow, but I do like the g-2/gold bug set up better just wish was waterproof
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom