reply
What detector would you recommend for ocean beach hunting?
Well, I'm a bit biased, since I want a discriminator to pass nails and iron. D/t we have past generations of burned down piers, and/or beaches that allow (or allowed in the past) beach bon-fires (which introduce nails via burned wood). So if your beaches are "Baywatch" Malibu or Hawaii type strictly touristy beaches (with no industrial/commercial type history/usage), then you might go for any of various beach pulse machines. They're deep-seeking, easy to use, and cut through the nastiest of minerals. Problem is, if you're on a beach with a lot of nails (and depth and minerals is a non-isse d/t abundance of targets), you might not be happy. So it all depends on your beaches, as to how clean they are, what your patience is, etc...
Personally, I prefer a standard machine, because to be honest with you, they get normal coins and rings just as deep an most beach pulse machines nowadays anyhow (eg.: to as much as a foot). Granted you'll miss dainty fine chains or earing studs, but for all other targets, the depth is about the same. Thus I prefer to have something that can pass iron, on our particular beaches.
If you plan on hunting during storm erosion (rain, etc...), or to potentially get whapped by waves in the surf-zone hunting, then go with the excaliber. But if you're just going to stay in the inter-tidal zone (and don't mind wrapping in plastic for occasional splashes), then go with the Explorer or Sovereign. All 3 are about equal for depth, and ability in wet-salt minerals. I just like the sound and tones and target separation of the Explorer (verses the excal and sov. which have loud long drawn out beeooonngggs). But the end result is about the same for depth and minerals, on wet salt beaches.