Re: Boy this city doesn't like MD'ing
Allen, on what basis did that ticket get written? You say it was issued "because the guy was md'ing", but do you know if there's an actual "no metal detecting" rule there? Or was it written because of some "damage" or "collecting" type verbage that was morphed to apply to his md'ing? Please clarify this. City park rules are available at either the city hall or police dept. on a binder which sits on the front counter, or available on-line.
If there is no detecting prohibitions, and the guy got the "ticket" because of something else morphed, then my hunch is he must've been some sort of big nuisance. Ie.: leaving holes (or being VERY indiscreet in the process), or was someone who couldn't take a warning, etc..... They do not just issue tickets for something, if a rule doesn't specifically exist, unless you were being a major nuisance in another area of perceived violation. Sorry, but something just isn't clicking.
SWR: If someone were strip-mining the turf for use in their own front yard, or other such "harvesting" or "collecting" actions, then those activities would be covered under the "no collecting" type verbage. I do not consider metal detecting to be in violation of collecting or destruction/vandalism clauses. If you think that we are inherently ........ by-definition ...... in violation of such clauses, then you have lost the battle already. You have chosen the wrong hobby. Because I can guarantee you that there is NO public park in the USA (on ANY level of government), that you could get permission to "damage and vandalize" and "collect/harvest for personal enjoyment/enrichment". Go ahead, I challenge anyone here, who has ever gotten a "yes", to return to that desk clerk and ask if this means it's ok to "damage" "vandalize" and "collect/harvest", and see how fast your yes gets turned to a no. Thus I do not see these things to apply to us.
If I intend to leave no trace of my presence, and am "removing" things that were/are invisible & unknown (as opposed to trees, shrubs, & picnic tables), then I do not consider this a violation. To think otherwise, is to have already lost the battle.