Bullet ID

cmthunder

Hero Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
844
Reaction score
2,298
Golden Thread
0
Location
Maryland
Detector(s) used
Minelab Xterra
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
AB1AD86C-1646-4D56-B89B-A8C7F05503F4.webp223CE71C-9A8E-49BC-9E53-D8615367107D.webp5DE34A2B-D752-4529-9065-347F00C7132F.webpFound this bullet in Western Maryland at site of Civil War battle.
It has solid base and raised ring.
It measures as follows;
D-.511
L-.895
22 grams=339.512 grains
E27D0B39-A7D0-4F38-9B8B-9F617CCF14D9.webp12F18A06-7DF8-4A41-8232-B8B0AACED563.webp
Is this a Pope type for false muzzle rifle?
#59 in McKee book2DA6A830-753F-48CF-BBFC-EEE5F1687DFE.webp

Thanks
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
Last edited:
S#59 McKee
D-.517
L-.890
341 grains
Looks like what I found.
The Smith is close thanks for the link
Chuck
 

Last edited:
Can you post a picture of the McKee #59 bullet? I even have the small Handbook of Civil War Bullets and Cartridges by James E and Dean S, Thomas that has a cross reference to M&M in the back it has F/C for M&Ms #59. That means fired or carved and not listed in this book. I am just curious what Mason And McKee shows.
 

Last edited:
59 McKee6659611F-51A6-4E9B-A58A-8227354A1D76.webpABC6A539-B866-49CE-A15F-0E4CB120E0E1.webp
 

Thanks for the pictures. I have to say that I don't see a match between your bullet and McKees #59. Other than the measurements the bullets do not resemble each other. But, that is just my uneducated opinion.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom