Digger Joe said:
Its hard for me to imagine how negitive and blind some can be, (reminds me of the above Welber Wright story), its hard for me to imagine hows it is possible that people would think that the world is just always going to stay the same? That computers and things each year can and will never get any better? I cannot imgine that mentality, can you?
The year 2006 is coming. Can and will the worlds electronics and inventions get better and better, you decide

But, Thank God I know that everything each year in electronics is only getting better and better, and that I have enough brains to pay attention and watch
If you really believe it works, why not snatch an easy and cool $25K? The money is now being offered to anyone, not just manufacturers:
http://www.thunting.com/cgi-bin/geotech/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reward.dat
The Challenge
I am offering a $25,000 reward to any manufacturer of a "long-range locator" device if they can simply demonstrate that it really works. I am also extending this offer to anyone else, with slight restrictions.
Originally this offer was made only to manufacturers, and the test protocol was left undefined, because I thought the fairest possible test to be one in which the manufacturer could specify the exact protocol that he felt would demonstrate his particular claim. Unfortunately, this concept was too difficult for some people to comprehend, and they wanted to spend more time arguing about the diabolical reasons for my offering flexible conditions, rather than just stating, "Here's what I can do with my LRL, and here's how it can be tested."
Since most LRL claims, explicitly or implicitely3, involve locating gold at a distance, I have decided to propose a standard protocol for testing this ability. Returning to the metal detector in the first paragraph, if I wanted to create a test to see whether a metal detector could fundamentally detect metal, then I might try something that should be ludicrously easy, like an axe head at a distance of 2 inches. Likewise, in testing a basic ability of an LRL to do anything useful, a test that would seem ludicrously easy is a good starting point. If an LRL can pass this test, then further tests can be designed to evaluate performance claims, such as distance and discrimination, if there is any desire to do so. This challenge is limited to basic functionality.
The Test
A summary of the standard protocol is as follows:
* Place a target (manufacturer's choice4 ) at a randomly chosen location out of several possible clearly marked locations.
* Use the LRL to determine which location the target is at.
* Test will be repeated several times, in order to distinguish real performance from guessing.5
The full details of the test can be found on the Test page.
http://www.thunting.com/cgi-bin/geotech/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reward_test.dat