CZ-3D vs Fisher F-75

I have both and first let me say some say the new 3Ds are not as deep as the older ones.
A good running 3D should air test a dime at over 11 inches.
The 2 machines are a very good complement to each.
The 3D is very stable and easy to use in older site or wet sand beach hunting.
The F 75 is better in iron [ there were no DD coils made for the CZ line ]
The F 75 is lighter and with the DD coil a better relic hunter.
The CZ running 2 freqs at the same time can hand a bigger range of soil types with on problem.
 

CoilFisher said:
Thank you Sandman and yes I can read, but reading only tells half the story. I am sure by now alot of people really have used both. The F-75 has been out for several years.
I hate to break your bubble CoilFisher but i never used the F-75 or the CZ-3D................And i have been detecting for almost 40 years.............
 

CZ-3D doesn't give you the "chatter" on items you have DISC'd out (pull tabs, iron, etc.) whereas, the F-75 sort of blips and bleeps (chatters) alot as you swing it even if the item is DISC'd.
I like the fact the CZ-3D "electrical guts" sits off the ground when you set it down, whereas the F-75 has you placing it on the ground on the battery and headphone jack area.
F-75 has a narrow support stand so easily tipped over, whereas the CZ-3D has a wider support stand and seems better balanced.
The F-75 does have a backlight and the ability to NOTCH out/in items. That is a bonus for that unit.
I was under a huge powerline today (top of a mountain) and had no EMI with the F-75; the line was only about 35 feet overhead.

They both find coins no question and at good depths.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom