DATELINE: London, England – Old Newspaper Reporting 1715 Disaster Revealed

BigWaveDave

Gold Member
Nov 22, 2013
9,180
16,378
Mountain Maryland
🥇 Banner finds
2
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
4
Detector(s) used
Garrett AT Pro, AT Max, Minelab
Equinox 800
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
While the vernacular of 300 years ago has changed...its clear what a big deal this was.
 

kingskid1611

Gold Member
Feb 23, 2015
8,121
6,646
Oklahoma
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
It would take months for this story to circulate. Bet they wish they had Internet and cellular phones back then.Its pretty interesting.
 
OP
FISHEYE

FISHEYE

Bronze Member
Feb 27, 2004
2,330
391
lake mary florida
Detector(s) used
Chasing Dory ROV,Swellpro Splash 2 pro waterproof drone,Swellpro Spry+ wa,Wesmar SHD700SS Side Scan Sonar,U/W Mac 1 Turbo Aquasound by American Electronics,Fisher 1280x,Aquasound UW md,Aqua pulse AQ1B
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #4
You can see how the news changed from 10 ships lost to now 2 ships lost and all the treasure recovered.I guess that news thru the grapevine got changed.Then we have the 1715 story 300 years later and it was 11 ships lost and the griphon was the only ship that survived.I have never heard of the V.Z. The Flying-Heart that survived.
 

grossmusic

Sr. Member
Jul 19, 2013
348
445
Cape Canaveral / Orlando
Detector(s) used
I detect the history: I've visited archives up & down the entire US East Coast, Bahamas, Jamaica, Kew, The Hague, etc. Have yet to go to Seville or S.American archives.
Primary Interest:
Shipwrecks
I couldn't find any Boston News-Letter stuff from August 1715 thru April 1716, so either they didn't report it, my eyes were too tired to see it in the old print, or news took a year to hit the northeast coast. The latter seems unlikely since Bellamy was already on his way from Massachusetts to "fish ye wrecks" by April 1716 & there's lots of misc documentation in 1716 about the wrecks.

I did find this in my archives - from The Post Boy dated Saturday January 7 to 10 1715 (which on the Julian calendar was 1716):
Pages from misc research.jpg
King James III arrives in Edinburgh... - RareNewspapers.com

I believe Madre de Dios could be any of the ships. It's not like they had their names blasted on the bow or the stern.

But now I question whether this is 1716 (even though Saturday January 7 aligns with 1716). The "infante" Francisco was the short-lived 2nd son of Philip V, born 1717, died 1 month later. However, the queen had a miscarriage in January 1715 just 1 or 2 months into pregnancy, so now I'm really confused. Maybe this entry has nothing to do with the 1715 wrecks?

Then again...

If it is 1715 (reporting on ships lost in 1714), perhaps Madre de Dios was one of the many ships Ubilla lost while languishing at Veracruz?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Steve's Detector Rods
Top