Death Traps??

No. In this analogy, if the family is running a long con you would be the "mark". The "blow off" would be the person who cools you down after they complete the con so you just move on and don't try to track them down. The "roper" would be the person who got you interested in the first place. The "stall" would be the person who is holding things up now to keep/increase your interest and/or get you to commit more resources. The "inside man" would be the person who set it all up and manages the whole thing. Rockford Files, man! It should be required viewing for everyone.
They must not be in a hurry since this was originally found approximately 28 years ago. I've been trying to get legal there unsuccessfully as have others for the last 20 years. But thanks for the explanation maybe these folks are on a different timetable than your theory would suggest.
 
They must not be in a hurry since this was originally found approximately 28 years ago. I've been trying to get legal there unsuccessfully as have others for the last 20 years.

I don't think they are running a game. That was more humor than anything. My guess is that they don't believe there is treasure there. That said, anybody who hunts for treasure should be on constant lookout for people trying to take advantage of their dreams of striking it big. The key to any con is making the mark think they are in charge and driving the process by playing to those dreams and greed.
 
I don't think they are running a game. That was more humor than anything. My guess is that they don't believe there is treasure there. That said, anybody who hunts for treasure should be on constant lookout for people trying to take advantage of their dreams of striking it big. The key to any con is making the mark think they are in charge and driving the process by playing to those dreams and greed

I don't think they are running a game. That was more humor than anything. My guess is that they don't believe there is treasure there. That said, anybody who hunts for treasure should be on constant lookout for people trying to take advantage of their dreams of striking it big. The key to any con is making the mark think they are in charge and driving the process by playing to those dreams and greed.
The owners were looking for treasure based on handed down information. They are the ones who asked my logger friends to come get me and help locate the treasure they were looking for. So obviously there was belief in the Treasure and that is not the reason for stopping me, but I appreciate your thoughts
 
Here's an interesting article for the Death Trap People. Archaeologists are supposedly afraid to open the tomb of China's first emperor, Qin Shi Huang because of the possibility of booby traps being present. The booby traps are said to be crossbows, aimed to bust a cap in the hiney of anyone who enters the tomb. Do I doubt the existence of crossbows? Not at all. There is a good probability that they were put there as claimed. What I doubt is that they are still functional after 2,200 years, primarily because of the three main components: The trip mechanisms, the bowstrings and the bows themselves.

For starters, what would trip mechanisms have been made of 2,200 years ago? Plant fiber string? Sinew or other body fibers? None of that would have survived, and as soon as it degraded enough the bows would have fired. The same would be true for the bowstrings, which would have been made of the same material. That leaves the crossbows, whih would have been made of either wood or ox horn, though it is remotely conceivable that since it was the Iron Age they could have been made of a flexible steel. So the crossbows might outlast the string parts, but since those are gone, so is any chance of the crossbows working. The arrows themselves may well be intact, albeit lying on the floor somewhere and the only danger being someone could stub their toe on the point of one of them and pick up a deadly infection.

The real danger, as the article mentions is the presence of mercury, which was used to simulate the key rivers in the empire. And tests have confirmed that mercury levels are higher around the tomb area than they should be. But the article also mentions that the mercury rivers were designed to flow by way of some mechanical means. So because the levels are higher around the tomb it indicates to me that the "mechanics" of the flowing mercury rivers have degraded and spread mercury all over the place. So from my perspective, the risk of death might be high, but the risk of death traps is pretty low. A person is more likely to die by having one of the Terracotta Army statues fall on them than by an arrow fired from an ancient crossbow.

Here's the article:

Archaeologists are too scared to open the tomb of China's first emperor because they fear booby traps

And here's a bonus article that takes a closer look at the fact or fiction surrounding the tomb:

The Booby Traps of Qin Shi Huang’s Tomb: Fact, Fiction or Something Even Better?

Conclusion: Indiana Jones would have survived the crossbows, made it to the tomb and looted it, but would have died a horrible death by mercury poisoning shortly afterward. And that raises another question: How much mercury would have been manufactured for these rivers, and how many people died from exposure making it? I'm actually kind of suspicious that any serious quantity of mercury could have been made 2,200 years ago for this purpose, even if Qin Shi Huang reigned for 11 years.
 
Actually, I would bet my life on it. My concern would be a 10'x10'x2', 40,000lb. door falling on me, not a death trap going off. And as such, I would plan to be at least 20' away and off to the side as I USED A CHAIN TO SIMPLY PULL THE DOOR OVER. Let's be serious here. Even assuming a door like that is set up with a several hundred year old, still functioning death trap, the people who put it there would need a large group of people to a) open it, and b) at least one more to disarm the death trap. All with the materials and equipment available at the time. It's the same thing if I were exploring an old gold mine. I'd be less worried about the Wile E. Coyote trap set up by the crazy old prospector than I am of a mine collapse that could occur because the mine is so old.



So post a picture of one here so we can see what you are talking about. It's the fact that gravity works that undermines the idea of death traps lasting 500 years and still working. Where in the United States is it geologically, biologically and climatologically stable enough for a primitive mechanical device to survive the elements and still remain functional? Florida--the land of endless sinkholes, swamps and tree roots? Colorado--the land of rock slides? Louisiana--the land of swamps, tree roots and flooding? Tree roots destroy rocks as they grow. Snow and ice destroy rocks as they freeze, melt and freeze again. Moisture rots all wood. Rain and wind cause erosion one day, and soil and debris to accumulate the next. People sometimes have to dig down several feet to find artifacts that are 150 years old. Extrapolate that out to 500 years and these death traps could easily be covered by 10'-15' of soil and rocks, and have trees with 24" trunks growing over them. So where in the United States is it stable enough for a death trap to stay intact for this long?
In Arizona
 
In Arizona

I would certainly agree that Arizona is both geologically and climatologically stable enough. But not in the biological sense. Anything made 500 years ago from wood or other plants would be out of commission by now. Even metal death traps wouldn't last that long in Arizona because metal fatigues, and also reacts with oxygen over time. I suppose you could build a sand trap using stone blocks that would last 500+ years. But you still have to have a trip mechanism that would last that long for it to work. It's the trip mechanism that is the weak link in the chain.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom