just like any medicinal drugs in the market, before you commercialize the said medicine, you must test it in animals for positive results. once it yielded any trace of positive results, it is tested on monkeys (our closest relatives). to test it on humans would be utterly and morally irresponsible. once successful, the said medicines will be tested once more with the food and drugs board , or any government regulation agency to see if the private claim is really true. once given the approval by the said government agency, the said medicine will now be ready for commercialization and distribution in the market. periodically, actual results to humans will be checked and regulated to see any harmful side effects. once it has been tested through time, the one who formulated and discovered the medicine can now claim success and vouch for its effectiveness . the single reason why it can claim success for its effectiveness because it has proof and there are actual results.
in detecting a yamashita treasure, before you can say your way of detection is effective, you must present proof and positive finds. to say that your detection is so effective that it can help the one who paid you detection money retrieve the treasure is irresponsible if you have not retrieved any treasures yet. talk is cheap if you always say that you have already retrieved a treasure without any proof. you have already visited sites, maybe a hundred sites all over the Philippines and where is the proof after so many years?
which is more helping the poor, claiming your detection is so effective that warrants the one who will gullibly rely on the effectiveness of your detection to dole out their limited and precious money for your professional detection fee , knowing at the back of your mind that he had not retrieved any treasures yet or knowing that he cannot present proof of success for your claim, or the one who does not claim that he can help the poor get the yamashita treasure?
what I am only saying here is this, when someone spends their hard earned money for your detection , that person expects that he can help you locate and retrieve the treasure. your customer is not playing here. he expects results and not any good to hear stories of your detection escapades all over the Philippines. so when you claim your detection is effective and it does not yield any results, that is misrepresentation . I think that alone does not help the poor but making the poor become poorer.
