Do The Math!

[aarthrj3811]

It seems that this topic has been discussed by treasure hunters to it’s fullest…

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

It seems that this topic has been discussed by treasure hunters to it’s fullest…

You're just tired of seeing the truth. Because you have no logical rebuttal to it.

Sorry, that you have made a career out of being a chump for the LRL makers, but who's fault is that?.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI bk, but still sniffling and coughing a bit.

K it was posted -->So, the only percentages that are significant for testing dowsing or LRLs,
re those between 50 and 100. Because anything less would mean that the locating device is
doing nothing better than someone just guessing.
****************

Hmm frankly, but 'either' side of 50 % could be just --Quote -> "nothng better than just guessing", no?

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

HI bk, but still sniffling and coughing a bit.

K it was posted -->So, the only percentages that are significant for testing dowsing or LRLs,
re those between 50 and 100. Because anything less would mean that the locating device is
doing nothing better than someone just guessing.
****************

Hmm frankly, but 'either' side of 50 % could be just --Quote -> "nothng better than just guessing", no?

Don Jose de La Mancha

My statement would refer to an average, merely in order to establish a definition with which to communicate the concept.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

EE, you put sugar in my coffee sheesh.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re Run..Yawn

 

[fenixdigger]

Let's do the math on the odds you will ANSWER the questions.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Let's do the math on the odds you will ANSWER the questions.

He must think he is doing a Scientific study for Weird Science..Carl and all of us have told him that his math does not apply to the way we use our LRL’s,
~Carl~
With LRLs and dowsing, "random chance" applies to randomized blind tests, not to field use. A randomized blind test does 2 things that a field test cannot do. First, it eliminates outside influences that might alter performance results, such as observable clues. Second, it provides a baseline from which to compare results, namely guessing.

Despite intentional attempts to mislead people, random chance doesn't apply to field use. You can't ask, "What are the odds of digging 10 holes in a park and recovering a gold coin?" There is no way to calculate that, because there is not enough information*. But in a randomized blind test, it is quite easy to calculate the odds. Depending on the design of the test those odds can vary, so it is not a fixed number that applies to every test, but it's not a "moving target" either.

 

[fenixdigger]

You know when Carl gave me a set up to determine random chance, it did prove out in the yard, but simply with metal targets not

coins or valuables. Since the farmhouse is over 100 yrs old, a lot of stuff is in the ground. But out in the field, random chance fell

apart badly, with no targets of any kind near the 10 spots. For me to go straight to a target from almost 1/4 mile away was not

blind luck. I did end up with 2 targets, 1 ornamental metal piece with gold leaf and 1 hardened steel piece with electrolysis on it.

The chemicals the farmers use, must have caused it.

The most corrosive chemical would probably cause them to ANSWER the question. Man up or shut up,,,,

 

[EE THr]

With LRLs and dowsing, "random chance" applies to randomized blind tests, not to field use. A randomized blind test does 2 things that a field test cannot do. First, it eliminates outside influences that might alter performance results, such as observable clues. Second, it provides a baseline from which to compare results, namely guessing.

That means that it is easier to have success in Carl's test, than "in the field."

Therefore, Carl is making it even easier for you to pass his scientific test.

...And you complain about that?

You have therefore corroborated that you are nitpicking about Carl's test---that can only mean that you know that you can't pass it, and are merely grasping at straws for excuses not to.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

You know when Carl gave me a set up to determine random chance, it did prove out in the yard, but simply with metal targets not

coins or valuables. Since the farmhouse is over 100 yrs old, a lot of stuff is in the ground. But out in the field, random chance fell

apart badly, with no targets of any kind near the 10 spots. For me to go straight to a target from almost 1/4 mile away was not

blind luck. I did end up with 2 targets, 1 ornamental metal piece with gold leaf and 1 hardened steel piece with electrolysis on it.

The chemicals the farmers use, must have caused it.

The most corrosive chemical would probably cause them to ANSWER the question. Man up or shut up,,,,

Your "questions" are what are known as "loaded questions." Any school kid is familiar with your tactic.

As I have said before, your questions are actually known as "interrogatory statements." In other words, you are making a false statement which is shrouded to appear as a question. Been there, done that.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Thanks for your non answers to the simple questions. Should I help you come up with excuses, the ones you are using are

pretty weak. Everyone's used to the twisting and subject changing, and the transference is actually expected so look at some like this.

No habla englas

Vas es dass?

Not tonight, I've got a headache.

My shorts are to tight for that now. I've got a rash. There's something in my eye. I broke a nail.

Much better than what you are using.

Man up or shut up---Answer the questions---Sat stepped up--your turn.

 

[EE THr]

Thanks for your non answers to the simple questions. Should I help you come up with excuses, the ones you are using are

pretty weak. Everyone's used to the twisting and subject changing, and the transference is actually expected so look at some like this.

No habla englas

Vas es dass?

Not tonight, I've got a headache.

My shorts are to tight for that now. I've got a rash. There's something in my eye. I broke a nail.

Much better than what you are using.

Man up or shut up---Answer the questions---Sat stepped up--your turn.

What part of #32 in the bottom link don't you understand?




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

I want to do the math on you giving real answers to real questions. Here's the odds on you ever getting another answer to any

of your questions until you do 0%


Man up or shut up. ANSWER the questions

 

[EE THr]

I want to do the math on you giving real answers to real questions. Here's the odds on you ever getting another answer to any

of your questions until you do 0%


Man up or shut up. ANSWER the questions

fenis brothers---Andser: #32 in the bottom link. Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

If you want to protest the F for your math please find someone who cares…Art

 

[EE THr]

If you want to protest the F for your math please find someone who cares…Art

Another pure insult from artie, who whines about people insulting him.








Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Quote from: aarthrj3811 on Today at 04:07:24 PM
If you want to protest the F for your math please find someone who cares…Art

Another pure insult from artie, who whines about people insulting him.

When has telling the truth become an insult..The reasons for your F grade is very obvious..It does not apply to using LRL’s for the purpose they were made for. Find someone who cares to complain..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

Quote from: aarthrj3811 on Today at 04:07:24 PM
If you want to protest the F for your math please find someone who cares…Art

Another pure insult from artie, who whines about people insulting him.

When has telling the truth become an insult..The reasons for your F grade is very obvious..It does not apply to using LRL’s for the purpose they were made for. Find someone who cares to complain..Art

The posts to which you are referring, actually make a prominent distinction between field "use" and a controlled environment test.

It explains why you should do much better in a controlled environment test than in the field, which makes it much easier to pass the controlled test. Especially since you only need to score a measly 70% success rate.

But, apparently you have no confidence that you can do even that, so all you can do is make up excuses, and lie like you just did.

That's downright pathetic.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Well Art; you know that was an insult, you called him a liar and a con man,,,Oh wait, sorry, that was him. Wellll, you told the truth.

That was an insult to him. Lucky he didn't get blood poisoning.

Man up or shut up ANSWER the questions