Does anybody find errors?

silvereagle78

Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
453
Reaction score
5
Golden Thread
0
Location
The Burgh PA
Detector(s) used
Minelab Explorer SE, Whites SilverEagle
When I CRH I check each individual coin for errors and have yet to find anything! Is anybody finding any or am I the only one looking. I have seen that a few people have found the AM varieties which I cant seem to track any down and I haven't seen anyone come up with newer DD errors or rotated reverses. Let me know what you find so I can live vicariously through your CRH experience. Thanks
 

Upvote 0
Susan B Anthony dollar coins I have found one 1979 wide rim :)

For Halves I have found 4 1977-D without the FG under the left leg, aside from that no errors found :(

Do you have any suggestions?
 

Just got to keep at it. It took almost a year to get some nice ones. I got a significant penny clip, a wheat with two clips, 2 laminated planchets, grease filled die, and many nickel varieties (2x1941 large s, 1941 inverted s, etc).

Most errors are picked out by the public before we come along, so either you must got through a lot of coins or get bags of unrolled mint coins (straight from the mint) to get spectacular errors, or boxes for coins that can fit in rolls, like blanks

For varieties, I would get a guide book, availible in most book stores. If you do that, make sure to get a pile of the date and mint which makes it easier to compare

HH
-GC
 

I search for errors constantly, and am finding very little to show for all the hours I spend looking thru a loupe trying to spot em!

some errors MAY be spotted by the general public but a lot of errors you need magnification to see them and NO WAY the general population are finding them and saving them. I refuse to believe that.

I can bet you money you could ask 100 people on the street if they had any clue at all what a wide AM penny was and you'd be lucky if 1 or 2 people had a clue what your talking about.
 

I bought a bunch of silver coins a couple of days ago. (sorry not CRH) and in one lot of about $50 (face value) of dimes were 4 merc's that just didn't look right. (sorry no pics) They looked identical maybe 1mm smaller and 50% thicker that your standard silver dime. The reeded rim is very well struck but the image front and back is weak. At first I thought a counterfit coin but that is a lot of work to fake a dime. Now I think they might be counterfit but overstruck on a foreign non-silver coin.

I will try and get pics later, very busy today with honey-do's. :(
(revise 5PM) Here are the pics as promised.

This is what they look like mixed in with real mercs
merc-1.webp

The next two shots are front and back with real coins left and right.
merc-2.webp merc-3.webp

The rest are close-ups and extreme close-ups
merc-4.webp merc-5.webp merc-6.webp merc-7.webp merc-8.webp

Need you guys opinion.
Counterfit?
Overstrike of foreign coin to pass as real?
Overstrike on forein coin planchet at the U.S. Mint?
Or?
 

I search only halves and I look for certain errors all of the time. I find them too! I've only been searching for about a year and a half and probably have 40-50+ error coins that I have found. Here are a few that I look for and have found.

1974d doubled die obverse
1982p no FG
1976d reverse cud error at 2 o'clock
1976d reverse cud error at 11 o'clock
Lamination errors
Misaligned die errors
greased die errors
struck through errors
Clipped planchets
 

Attachments

  • DSC00900.webp
    DSC00900.webp
    19.6 KB · Views: 236
  • DSC01765.webp
    DSC01765.webp
    36.8 KB · Views: 238
  • DSC01124.webp
    DSC01124.webp
    21.5 KB · Views: 230
  • off center.webp
    off center.webp
    31.4 KB · Views: 240
  • 1971 underweight half.webp
    1971 underweight half.webp
    16.8 KB · Views: 236
  • 8rev closer.webp
    8rev closer.webp
    38.3 KB · Views: 238
  • 3obv.webp
    3obv.webp
    24.4 KB · Views: 232
  • DSC01785.webp
    DSC01785.webp
    20.2 KB · Views: 223
  • DSC01037.webp
    DSC01037.webp
    40.8 KB · Views: 239
  • DSC01529.webp
    DSC01529.webp
    25 KB · Views: 223
  • DSC01568.webp
    DSC01568.webp
    36.3 KB · Views: 229
  • off center.webp
    off center.webp
    31.4 KB · Views: 233
  • DSC00900.webp
    DSC00900.webp
    19.6 KB · Views: 245
  • DSC01765.webp
    DSC01765.webp
    36.8 KB · Views: 242
  • DSC01124.webp
    DSC01124.webp
    21.5 KB · Views: 238
  • 8rev closer.webp
    8rev closer.webp
    38.3 KB · Views: 231
  • 3obv.webp
    3obv.webp
    24.4 KB · Views: 231
  • 1982 no FG.webp
    1982 no FG.webp
    44.8 KB · Views: 238
  • 1971 underweight half.webp
    1971 underweight half.webp
    16.8 KB · Views: 233
  • DSC01785.webp
    DSC01785.webp
    20.2 KB · Views: 232
  • DSC01529.webp
    DSC01529.webp
    25 KB · Views: 229
  • DSC01037.webp
    DSC01037.webp
    40.8 KB · Views: 224
  • DSC01568.webp
    DSC01568.webp
    36.3 KB · Views: 221
Very interesting Mercs. Do they "ring" when you tap them? What if you file the edge off of one to see what the underlying metal looks like?

Keep us posted!
 

Ifyndit said:
I search only halves and I look for certain errors all of the time. I find them too! I've only been searching for about a year and a half and probably have 40-50+ error coins that I have found. Here are a few that I look for and have found.

1974d doubled die obverse
1982p no FG
1976d reverse cud error at 2 o'clock
1976d reverse cud error at 11 o'clock
Lamination errors
Misaligned die errors
greased die errors
struck through errors




Wow, nice selection of errors :thumbsup: Do you only search halves?
Clipped planchets
 

cyberdan said:
I bought a bunch of silver coins a couple of days ago. (sorry not CRH) and in one lot of about $50 (face value) of dimes were 4 merc's that just didn't look right. (sorry no pics) They looked identical maybe 1mm smaller and 50% thicker that your standard silver dime. The reeded rim is very well struck but the image front and back is weak. At first I thought a counterfit coin but that is a lot of work to fake a dime. Now I think they might be counterfit but overstruck on a foreign non-silver coin.

I will try and get pics later, very busy today with honey-do's. :(
(revise 5PM) Here are the pics as promised.

This is what they look like mixed in with real mercs



The next two shots are front and back with real coins left and right.




The rest are close-ups and extreme close-ups







Need you guys opinion.
Counterfit?
Overstrike of foreign coin to pass as real?
Overstrike on forein coin planchet at the U.S. Mint?
Or?



I hope someone knows ??? I can't even give an opinion on this one. Nice find though :o
 

Goes4ever said:
I search for errors constantly, and am finding very little to show for all the hours I spend looking thru a loupe trying to spot em!

some errors MAY be spotted by the general public but a lot of errors you need magnification to see them and NO WAY the general population are finding them and saving them. I refuse to believe that.

I can bet you money you could ask 100 people on the street if they had any clue at all what a wide AM penny was and you'd be lucky if 1 or 2 people had a clue what your talking about.


I only use a 4X should I move to a 10X?
 

silvereagle78 said:
Ifyndit said:
I search only halves and I look for certain errors all of the time. I find them too! I've only been searching for about a year and a half and probably have 40-50+ error coins that I have found. Here are a few that I look for and have found.

1974d doubled die obverse
1982p no FG
1976d reverse cud error at 2 o'clock
1976d reverse cud error at 11 o'clock
Lamination errors
Misaligned die errors
greased die errors
struck through errors




Wow, nice selection of errors :thumbsup: Do you only search halves?
Disregard my last question about only searching halves, I answered it myself when I read your post again :BangHead: Anyway how did you search before you found your first error: Thanks
 

silvereagle78 said:
Goes4ever said:
I search for errors constantly, and am finding very little to show for all the hours I spend looking thru a loupe trying to spot em!

some errors MAY be spotted by the general public but a lot of errors you need magnification to see them and NO WAY the general population are finding them and saving them. I refuse to believe that.

I can bet you money you could ask 100 people on the street if they had any clue at all what a wide AM penny was and you'd be lucky if 1 or 2 people had a clue what your talking about.


I only use a 4X should I move to a 10X?
well I use an 8x and a 10x
personally a 4x would not be good enough for me, but maybe your eyes are better than mine? You can get em on ebay pretty cheap!
 

silvereagle78 said:
silvereagle78 said:
Ifyndit said:
I search only halves and I look for certain errors all of the time. I find them too! I've only been searching for about a year and a half and probably have 40-50+ error coins that I have found. Here are a few that I look for and have found.

1974d doubled die obverse
1982p no FG
1976d reverse cud error at 2 o'clock
1976d reverse cud error at 11 o'clock
Lamination errors
Misaligned die errors
greased die errors
struck through errors




Wow, nice selection of errors :thumbsup: Do you only search halves?
Disregard my last question about only searching halves, I answered it myself when I read your post again :BangHead: Anyway how did you search before you found your first error: Thanks

I started searching for 1974D ddo with a 10x loupe. Then I started looking for the 1982p no FG (you don't need a glass to spot these) The others I just started to find here and there. Again, most of the errors I find you don't need a loupe to see, you just have to be observant when searching (both visually and audibly).
 

Cyberdan,

They look fake to me. The question is, why bother with dimes ?
 

Rich Hartford said:
Cyberdan, They look fake to me. The question is, why bother with dimes ?
I am sure they are fake. But remember that is a middle 40's dime. Got more buyng power back then. I am going to post this on a coin forum and let you all know their opinion.

Maybe that planchet was only worth a cent back then = 9 times profit.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom