aarthrj3811 said:
~EE~
Signal, himself, indicates that LRLs are dowsers, in his Original Post at the top of this thread. He also says that all of the books on the subject say so too. I have said it. Carl and SWR have said it. You have already read where Woof! has said it.
All of those whom you refer to as LRL "users" have figured it out, sooner or later, when they realize that they don't work (unless they have gone over the edge, into Fantasyland, as a few apparently have).
The Department of Justice says so, and courts have said so.
Why haven't you figured it out yet? Is it Fantasyland or Moneyland, which is affecting your "judgement"?
I don’t agree with that...But...What would be wrong if it was true....After all..Dowsing has been proven to be 96% accurate..
You've posted that 96% accuracy figure before, Art. I don't usually comment about dowsing, because I have no particular reason to believe that there aren't some people who can find stuff with it.
But your 96% figure came from one area, where people were dowsing for water. As I, and others, have stated before, there is the
Water Table factor. Looking at a diagram of the concept of Water Table, you can see that there is water underground essentially
everywhere. In some places it is closer to the surface than others, but also in some areas,
anywhere you drill, you will find water at an acceptable depth.
So your one example doesn't mean diddly. Plus, with dowsing, you need to walk directly over the water, and get a "dip" in the forked branch or whatever you're using. So, even if your statistic of one example actually meant something, it in no way relates to the so-called "Long Range Locators," which supposedly point to something at a far distance.
This has been pointed out to you many times before, yet I see that you are still eager to try and continue your little myth.
