Note: Normally, people put a name at the top of their messages, so people know who they are replying to. Or they will place at least a portion of a quote, in the proper quote box format, to indicate that, and to give others a way to see the actual quoted message (by clicking on the word "Quote).
Those who rely on confusion, seem to refrain from making themselves clear, in their method of posting replies.
You continue to be your own best debunker.
There is no "theory" to it. A free test is a free test.
Nobody is talking about Signal's "terms" as being any part of "Scientific." In fact, it's as illogical as it gets. But it's a good example of you LRL promoters being your own best debunkers!
When a person or group has only very few facts to support their position, they will resort to filling in missing facts with insults.
But when they have no factual evidence at all, they will attempt to rely totally on insults, without posting any facts at all---like you have just done, above.
Thanks for continuing to be your own best debunkers!
Carl has a good test. But anyone can easily just claim it's somehow "not right." These claims never make any sense, but LRL promoters try to make them anyway. What else can they do?---They certainly can't pass a real Scientific test!
But nobody has had anything negative to say about
http://[u]my suggestions for a test[/u]. Even you can do that one, hung. So why don't you?
Nothing new here..Just more of EE’s conCarl has a good test. But anyone can easily just claim it's somehow "not right." These claims never make any sense, but LRL promoters try to make them anyway. What else can they do?---They certainly can't pass a real Scientific test!
But nobody has had anything negative to say about
http://[u]my suggestions for a test[/u]. Even you can do that one, hung. So why don't you?
