Effective Target Loss

The Beep Goes On

Silver Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
3,403
Reaction score
208
Golden Thread
0
Location
Houston, TX
Detector(s) used
CTX3030, Excalibur II, V3i, TRX
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
At the computer and should be coding, but got detecting on the brain. Oh well.

This is very generalized. I like to visualize and it helps a little. I don't think I have all variables - there's the terrain, for instance. What else?

effective-target-loss.webp

HH!
Beep
 

Upvote 0
Moisture, wet soil allows for more of a halo effect than dry earth.
 

Masking should be a category unto itself, and should be way higher up.
 

Can I get a cheeseburger with bacon, onions, mayo, mustard and ketchup please! :occasion14:
 

Thanks - Good input. The order is difficult...the funnel chart may not be the best mechanism. Different locations could have different "% Loss" at each step of the funnel potentially changing the order.

Masking is definitely way up there for a lot of sites but mineralization, "difficult to dig" ground, etc., might be a problem elsewhere. And, yeah, you'd want to split them up in whatever format the chart was in.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom