Error 1947 Washington quarter?

The Aluminum Monster

Hero Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
594
Reaction score
776
Golden Thread
0
Location
New Bedford, MA
Detector(s) used
White's Coinmaster Pro, Tesoro Mojave, Garrett AT Pro, 5x8 DD, 15" NEL Attack, Garrett Pro-pointer, Pro Series 5x9 sand scoop, 30" Royal Compact sluice, 36" Bazooka Gold Trap, Gold Cube.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Hi all. I came across this quarter yesterday and was wondering if you could tell me what you think of it? I don't really know my mint strike mistakes as I mainly just stack. Is this a mint error? I wouldn't expect the QU to be so visible and sunk in if someone had taken a tool to it. Any thoughts? I am heading to bed but look forward to any information when I wake up. Thanks and HH

-Jay

20180702_160927.webp

20180702_160942.webp
 

Upvote 0
20180703_043253.webp

20180703_043431.webp
 

PMD, never seen an error like that on any denom coin.
 

Thank you for the replies. I haven't quite seen anything like that from the stuff that has been posted here so I thought I would get your opinions. It's a neat little thing, especially how the lettering is still sharp even though it is sunk in. I'll just set it off to the side away from the others. Thanks again!
 

Interesting...….for those who said PMD can anyone explain why the dented, missing or otherwise displaced metal still shows the "QU" as appearing untouched?

HH all!

Greg
 

It is a punch mark. Nothing more. I did similar things to Lincoln cents many decades ago. Played a game called “Fun With Hammers”.

Time for more coffee.
 

It is a punch mark. Nothing more. I did similar things to Lincoln cents many decades ago. Played a game called “Fun With Hammers”.

Time for more coffee.

It may be but that still doesn't answer the question....."Fun with Hammers" mashes everything.....the "qu" are untouched here.....
attachment.php
 

Last edited:
I should have been more precise. Fun with hammers and punches. Specifically, hollow punches.

Also, there is no possible explanation for this happening at the mint, even with the slightly different procedures used in the 1940s. Still, 1235CE, you may believe what you wish.

Time for more coffee.
 

Post mint damaged.
 

The design looks better because it was punched down along with the rim. It looks good compared to the rest of the coin that's worn almost slick. The simple fact that the rim itself is pushed down verifies that it's psd.
 

It certainly caught my eye when I was going through some quarters. Definitely a neat piece that I put in a flip and set aside. The QU being in such good shape was the intriguing part to me.
 

The 'QU' shows nearly identical wear as the 'ARTER'. Had the damage occurred at the mint, the 'QU' would likely appear as it would on a freshly minted coin.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom