Just don’t understand the competency of these videos,or why they’re valid..If one machine could do somthing better than another then I guess the latter machine just won’t find anything ever again?Sounds kinda stupid huh?
I guess it comes down to a relic hunters point of view to a coin hunters point of view as to which machine is better for your needs..Have owned every machine out there,several times and although I thought the equinox was ok,it wasn’t my top pick..Visual ID was way too compressed and well,it’s a multi freak Minelab and loves deep iron..Id sooner pass over a 10 inch coin being called iron on the f75 than dig multiple 10 inch nails because the equinox calls them a coin..not even a close call there on my choice.
The deus is a relic machine,and although it has a expanded ID range it sucks for accuracy.And from the videos I’ve seen,so does the orx...If your a relic hunter digging everything that squeaks then the deus,orx And imo the equinox is probably a great machine.Im selective and try to dig as little junk and iron as I can.The AT pro and f75 trump the deus,Orx And equinox for visual ID reliability,not even close.
Like I said these videos are coming from a relic hunters point of view and are misleading to anyone who targets coins ,especially if you want to avoid zincs.Dug a lot of zincs with the equinox in the 26 range on ID..