Sounds kinda Kooky to me.
The reason the numbers are from 4 years back is those are the most recent ones you can find there. Have at it. Find me the numbers from the SEC filings to back up your claims, not some leftist bunch at CNN after they have put their spin on things. They can't even question outright lies made by an Exxon rep on their live news show, how can you expect them to get things right.
Unfortunately Smee, you can't read an accounting statement. The numbers you have given are for shareholders' return on equity. Using the report you refer to provides the following:
2004 - Total revenues were $8.2 billion and net earnings were $1.2 billion or profit of 14.6%
2003 - Total revenues were $6.51 billion and net earnings were $640 MILLION or profit of 9.8%
2002 - Total revenues were $5.27 billion and net earnings were $330 MILLION or profit of 6.3%
2001 - Total revenues were $6.77 billion and net earnings were $610 MILLION or profit of 9.0%
2000 - Total revenues were $9.21 billion and net earnings were $760 MILLION or profit of 8.3%
So, over that five year period, the total revenues were $35.96 billion and net earnings were $3.54 billion or profit of 9.84%. Hmmmmmmm, looks like that is between 8% and 10%. Thank you for proving my point (even if you didn't really want to).