What's new

Help with type?

Pbarker1492

Tenderfoot
Joined
May 27, 2020
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Golden Thread
0
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Hi all
Can you help me with this? Any idea on type?
It’s from Texas. Tip has been poorly restored just to give it shape.
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • F0401E1E-7EDF-49BB-A435-5C33EE8B44F9.webp
    F0401E1E-7EDF-49BB-A435-5C33EE8B44F9.webp
    228.3 KB · Views: 153
  • 890AF5D6-A593-4DB8-B8D3-6F9D5653132F.webp
    890AF5D6-A593-4DB8-B8D3-6F9D5653132F.webp
    231.3 KB · Views: 77
  • 338DB221-925A-4976-A89E-115E54E18A92.webp
    338DB221-925A-4976-A89E-115E54E18A92.webp
    197.6 KB · Views: 116
  • 8CDF4779-71F1-40C1-AC6D-15FBC7AD3A73.webp
    8CDF4779-71F1-40C1-AC6D-15FBC7AD3A73.webp
    182.3 KB · Views: 129
  • CBBF1AFF-3F38-40EC-B95E-FE85E2AEC33F.webp
    CBBF1AFF-3F38-40EC-B95E-FE85E2AEC33F.webp
    203.4 KB · Views: 77
Upvote 0
Grinding is last step before hafting.

FWIW, though, any time edges are on the thin side, striking platforms are ground before flakes are detached using them -- otherwise the struck edges would splinter.

Was waiting for some knapper to point this out.
 
Uniface
See the sides with the 3 base flakes removed, would the base need to be ground before those are removed? Perhaps it was ground at one point?
 
Sorry uniface-here is the pic. Does it look like some of the base was removed after the flakes were removed? Seems pretty clean removals? Wonder if the other side removed a bit more base when the two side flakes were removed?
 

Attachments

  • B4BB6A4B-C548-4E35-925A-2ABC25716044.webp
    B4BB6A4B-C548-4E35-925A-2ABC25716044.webp
    174.6 KB · Views: 69
I could take a run at it, but there are several people here with pretty extensive experience doing replication.

They can chime in any time they care to.
 
Very strange. Usually we have people falling over each other, rushing to post on stuff they're familiar with (to some degree). This time, crickets. Maybe it's because we're off the title topic by now so it's under the radar.

Anyhow: my old computer is unable to access this, but the description sounds right --
https://static.secure.website/wscfus/3780471/uploads/BasicConcepts.pdf

Homework you could have done yourself :)

Add later" a sentence Charl quotes in the incised pebble thread: "While doing the percussion work we have to abrade the edge of the point frequently."
 
Last edited:
My guess is that this one has many similarities to other Paleo points and it’s difficult to distinguish them. Plainview, midland, ango. Etc.
In taking with some off line the feedback I got was it was a Clovis, albeit not the usual style-possibly set up to reflute and possibly resharpened. It’s too thick for midland, hafting region not right for Folsom. One idea was Plainfield but earlier basal thinning flakes on one side rules out that technology. It resembles an Ango, but the base is wrong. It has a lot of similarities to Plano pieces but Clovis most likely. It’s 12mm thick and has at least 2 basal percussion thinning flakes that were covered by a lateral scar-perhaps from a later culture. That’s my guess and I’m sticking to it :)
 
My guess is that this one has many similarities to other Paleo points and it’s difficult to distinguish them. Plainview, midland, ango. Etc.
In taking with some off line the feedback I got was it was a Clovis, albeit not the usual style-possibly set up to reflute and possibly resharpened. It’s too thick for midland, hafting region not right for Folsom. One idea was Plainfield but earlier basal thinning flakes on one side rules out that technology. It resembles an Ango, but the base is wrong. It has a lot of similarities to Plano pieces but Clovis most likely. It’s 12mm thick and has at least 2 basal percussion thinning flakes that were covered by a lateral scar-perhaps from a later culture. That’s my guess and I’m sticking to it :)
You and I agree perfectly that we don't know what it is. I do also agree most likely Clovis but here are problems with that too
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom