TheNewCatfish
Sr. Member
- #1
Thread Owner
Last season i purchased the largest "Stream Sluice" Keen makes with the hopes of processing material as fast as i could shovel. I wasted a couple of hundred dollars with the system. Paying dirt directly into the sluice clogged the riffles instantly. Cleaned concentrate was about all it could handle. What's the point of operating a BIG Sluice if you have to feed it with a teaspoon ? I got soaked setting it up and operating it.. and the frequent cleanouts were time consuming and messy. The Miners Moss was totally useless. I never found so much as a single "micro" speck of gold in it. Adding insult to injury, a teenage kid operating a "Poop" Tube Sluice next to me (and digging the same dirt) blew me away. I was so disgusted with the performance of the Keen, i sold it to another prospector in Canon City for $50 dollars. I warned him in my opinon it was a "Piece of Garbage".. but he bought it anyway. Recently i have seen plans offered on "mygoldpanning.com" for a "High Production" Sluice. The design appears to incorporate several features that address my complaints about the standard sluice box. It sets up streamside on dry ground and looks like it could be adapted to collect water using a small hose and a cheap boat bilge pump to fill the water reservoir, (my idea, so there is no hauling buckets of water around). It looks like it has a built in "classifying and seperation" design that could possibly handle large quantities of raw materials. Has anyone tried this system or seen the ad ? I'm a little leary and skeptical because the website also features a range of manual suction devices, (Which we all know are worthless gadgets). Hand suction devices don't even pick up sand granuals efficiently off a streambed.. more less gold. They're just a gimmick. Like magnet devices that pick up black sand, but do nothing to seperate the gold from the magnatite. I've got too many gimmicks collecting dust in my garage already. I'm tired of spending my hard earned money on equipment with bogus, exaggerated claims about how well they work.