How rare are fluted points?

I have been hunting for 31 years and have found 2 broken fluted bases, an exhausted and broken clovis and a nice paleo knife. Although paleo pieces are rare, dovetails seem to be even harder to find in my area. Interestingly, all the paleo pieces I've found came from a site on a large hill.
 

Cachefind09 said:
I have been hunting for 31 years and have found 2 broken fluted bases, an exhausted and broken clovis and a nice paleo knife. Although paleo pieces are rare, dovetails seem to be even harder to find in my area. Interestingly, all the paleo pieces I've found came from a site on a large hill.
Welcome to T-Net Cachefind09. I think hills were a common anomaly for paleo. They knew high water could wipe out generations.
 

They are quite rare, I promise you. As someone who has walked hundreds of miles in the creeks, spent hundreds of hours digging over the last 11 years, I believe I would know. I know only handful of people in my region that have found even a broken one. The very first artifact that I found in a creek was a clovis with the tip impact-fractured off. It would be over 10 years of heavy hunting before the next piece was found. That happened to be a broken unfluted cumberland found by my brother and now in my collection. Four months later I found a super heartbreaker clovis (2010). That's it folks. If you find even a broken piece these days, you are extremely fortunate. By the way, that first clovis was stolen from me in 2003. If I ever meet up with that guy.....My take? RARE!!!! Trust me.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0005.webp
    DSCF0005.webp
    18.4 KB · Views: 539
  • DSCF0006.webp
    DSCF0006.webp
    20.1 KB · Views: 546
  • DSCF0007.webp
    DSCF0007.webp
    24.6 KB · Views: 546
  • DSCF0009.webp
    DSCF0009.webp
    32.4 KB · Views: 546
  • DSCF0010.webp
    DSCF0010.webp
    27.1 KB · Views: 537
  • DSCF0021.webp
    DSCF0021.webp
    23.9 KB · Views: 528
  • DSCF0023.webp
    DSCF0023.webp
    30.1 KB · Views: 518
  • DSCF0026.webp
    DSCF0026.webp
    22 KB · Views: 510
  • DSCF0027.webp
    DSCF0027.webp
    21.1 KB · Views: 516
IMHO I think they are actually much more rare than folks typically think. Several of the big players in the paleo archie world think that 50% or more of the high-end Clovis points in private collections and a large percentage of those in museums are fake. The latest RC dating puts the Clovis period at only a few hundred years. With small nomadic bands and all of North America it would be hard to imagine that they are not incredibly rare.

FWIW, I've hunted off and on for 50 years and have found one broken base and one mid section. My wife in 25 years of hunting found one -- but it was the Holy Grail.
 

mootsman said:
IMHO I think they are actually much more rare than folks typically think. Several of the big players in the paleo archie world think that 50% or more of the high-end Clovis points in private collections and a large percentage of those in museums are fake. The latest RC dating puts the Clovis period at only a few hundred years. With small nomadic bands and all of North America it would be hard to imagine that they are not incredibly rare.

FWIW, I've hunted off and on for 50 years and have found one broken base and one mid section. My wife in 25 years of hunting found one -- but it was the Holy Grail.

I have read the same thing. I think famous clovis guru archy Vance Haynes mentioned that upwards of 50% paleoindian spear points in collections are modernly made. It is mentioned in Adovasio's book on Meadowcroft shelter if I can remember correctly. I don't know what to think of it, but I have seen a whole lot of 4-5 inch perfect whoppers out there. Go to a local show and they are all over the place. Every serious collector seems to have one or two of these and that adds up to a whole lot of bags of money found in those fields. Haynes mentioned that every paleoindian camp site he has discovered upwards of 95% of the tools where broken and rarely a clovis found over 3" in length.
 

I've found 2 and half Clovis. They are all 2 1/2" or so. Not the monsters you see in some collections. I do know guite a few hunters around the area that have found them. One who hunts Halifax County found a 3" Crystal Clovis. I don't include the Hardaway in the fluted type though tough to find as well.
 

Attachments

  • DSC05198a.webp
    DSC05198a.webp
    45.6 KB · Views: 417
  • DSC05198a.webp
    DSC05198a.webp
    45.6 KB · Views: 411
mootsman said:
IMHO I think they are actually much more rare than folks typically think. Several of the big players in the paleo archie world think that 50% or more of the high-end Clovis points in private collections and a large percentage of those in museums are fake. The latest RC dating puts the Clovis period at only a few hundred years. With small nomadic bands and all of North America it would be hard to imagine that they are not incredibly rare.

FWIW, I've hunted off and on for 50 years and have found one broken base and one mid section. My wife in 25 years of hunting found one -- but it was the Holy Grail.


I think 50% is unfortunately too low of a percentage. I happen to agree with this guy.

http://www.jimmausartifacts.com/avoid-buying-fake/
 

I have only found five total including broken ones in 30 years. Two mostly whole ones and three bases. Found both the whole ones the same day. I should of bought a lottery ticket that day. I would guess that at least 75% of all the clovis points in collections and museums are fake.
 

!1! Not much but I got 1 hardaway with a small flute.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom