- #1
Thread Owner
Hello adamlray, what I meant/see from your last pic is the 'closed cap' with sediment surrounding/embedding its tentacles.My first thought was...(in your last photo), is two 'upright' Sealilly.. 'Criniod' flowertops/caps! Nice.

from roots to flower... with the 'cap' tentacles slightly open.Good pics!TJE, but look how deep the grooves are. Aren't plant impressions/ fossils usually very flat?
I'd say 99% sure.."sea lilly"....depending on the age/formation of the stone they are in..it changes the look of all fossils, for example...the fossil of mine is 430-450 million yrs of age/ Silurian era. Yours may be younger..or older! Plus, being found in a creek bed there is water erosion to help expose your find!
nice one! 
Very true HPThe object does have a resemblance to a crinoid. Be advised that crinoids are not plants. They are filter-feeding animals related to starfish.
but, come on now!....good clear pics...this ain't no 'object'!.. it's a fossil
Hey Age old, very nice! Do you the estimated date/age of your fossil? I've some I found from the eastern slopes of the Rockies 20-some yrs ago.It does look similar to a crinoid, but it also reminds me of lepidodendron bark. Just a thought![]()
