Interesting article on a man who says he has beales 3 diaries

Status
Not open for further replies.
FAKE, FAKE, FAKE!

HA! ALREADY proven to be FAKE! (WINK, here).
 

I feel stupid(red faced) I read the disclaimer too late,sorry.
 

(SMILE) I DO believe some of it IS based on true events, tho... (WINK)
 

Not me. My Book is titled, "The Lost Diary of Thomas J. Beall" with two l's.
 

...and is fiction based on 99% fact...is there really a difference between the two?
 

...and is fiction based on 99% fact...is there really a difference between the two?

It is just like "sin" guilty of the least, guilty of the whole.
 

Fiction based on 99% fact is still fiction and is not considered as a body of evidence of proof.

Have you got to write that 100 times more before you get to go home today.
 

Fiction based on 99% fact is still fiction and is not considered as a body of evidence of proof.

So then, what should we make of your pure fiction post?
 

So then, what should we make of your pure fiction post?
What do you claim is a "pure fiction post" that I made?
...and most important, do you have evidence that can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it is fiction?
 

What do you claim is a "pure fiction post" that I made?
...and most important, do you have evidence that can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it is fiction?

Are you not the one who claims if there is no outside proof of something it is fiction?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom