- #1
Thread Owner
...and is fiction based on 99% fact...is there really a difference between the two?
Question was meant for ECS...
Fiction based on 99% fact is still fiction and is not considered as a body of evidence of proof.It is just like "sin" guilty of the least, guilty of the whole.
Fiction based on 99% fact is still fiction and is not considered as a body of evidence of proof.
"Lawyering" again, I see...Fiction based on 99% fact is still fiction and is not considered as a body of evidence of proof.
Fiction based on 99% fact is still fiction and is not considered as a body of evidence of proof.
What do you claim is a "pure fiction post" that I made?So then, what should we make of your pure fiction post?
What do you claim is a "pure fiction post" that I made?
...and most important, do you have evidence that can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it is fiction?
Sorta like "ROBO-CALLS"; VERY annoying...Have you got to write that 100 times more before you get to go home today.
Are you not the one who claims if there is no outside proof of something it is fiction?