Do you think that ignoring or denying overwhelming documentation to the contrary strengthens your silly claims?
[/quote]
Captain,
Mr. Hunt speaks before he reads. Had he taken time to view information found at
http://www.ericjames.org/JesseJamesinTexas/letters.html, he would have seen this record:
"James L. Courtney was a real pack rat, and many letters that he had received and family photographs were found in his trunk after his death. I won't quote the letters in their entirety here, I will just give the dates, salutations and signatures:
1. March 29th, 1872 - Dear Brother and Sister - (lots of family news) signed T N Haun to J L Courtney (this would be his brother Theodore Napolean).
2. August l0th, 1872 - Dear Brother and Sister - (again describing family activities) signed Your Brother Theodore."
Mr. Hunt, upon seeing a reference to cousin Theodore in JLC's diary, immediately jumps to the erroneous conclusion that Theodore was in fact a cousin of JLC, a typical response of a novice researcher. Mr. Hunt, upon seeing a man with thick lenses in a blurry picture of the 1921 Quantrill guerrilla's reunion immediately jumped to the conclusion that it was Harry S. Truman. Mr. Hunt seems to believe that he is somewhat of a fashion expert on men's clothing.
The research and opinions of Mr. Hunt, Mrs. Duke, and Mr. Ellison lack credibility.