dognose
Silver Member
I found this point a few years back.
Categorically it would be classified as a kirk snapped base.
Over the last many years, I have found 3 Decatur points and many which would classified as kirk snapped base.
I have always had a nagging theory that they are NOT intentionally snapped.
overstreet states for the description of the kirk snapped base as:
A medium to large size, usually serrated, blade with long tangs and a base that has been snapped or fractured off. The shoulders are also fractured on some examples. This proves that the fracturing was intentional as in Decatur and other types.
To me that does not 'prove' anything.
I am not sure what other types than a Decatur they refer too. That is too subjective for me.
I have found a number of lost lakes over the years. One in particular could be considered a first stage - without any re-sharpenings. But on this point the bards ARE fractured off.
I would like to open the floor to discussions on the kirk snapped base theories.



Categorically it would be classified as a kirk snapped base.
Over the last many years, I have found 3 Decatur points and many which would classified as kirk snapped base.
I have always had a nagging theory that they are NOT intentionally snapped.
overstreet states for the description of the kirk snapped base as:
A medium to large size, usually serrated, blade with long tangs and a base that has been snapped or fractured off. The shoulders are also fractured on some examples. This proves that the fracturing was intentional as in Decatur and other types.
To me that does not 'prove' anything.
I am not sure what other types than a Decatur they refer too. That is too subjective for me.
I have found a number of lost lakes over the years. One in particular could be considered a first stage - without any re-sharpenings. But on this point the bards ARE fractured off.
I would like to open the floor to discussions on the kirk snapped base theories.



Upvote
0