If the point and bannerstone were dug together, why are the soil types so different on the blade and in the banner hole?
I've kept my mouth shut through all this, but hell, I wouldn't believe it if I dug all this myself. Not one speck of the dirt immediately surrounding each find looks like that associated with anything I've ever dug. Every bit looks disturbed and Tony, this should send up red flags for you as well.
Also, usually there is some type of common theme that develops with a site as artifacts are found whether in material, types, patination, etc. even in long-term occupation, multi-component sites. So far, nothing of the sort is evident. There just seems to be a Duke's mixture of finds with no rhyme or reason to the assortment, once again, so far.
No accusations here towards you, Tony. I hope that my doubts are proven unfounded, but as I said, I wouldn't believe this if I dug the finds myself.