Map Dowsing made easy

[dowser]

I'm not much of a map Dowser, mostly because I am not successful using a Pendulum, only 2 L-rods, which makes it difficult to pinpoint a target for me. This can possibly help others..
I have a US Atlas for the map Dowsing I do.
One State I have map Dowsed is Arkansas, signaling with Diamond, searching for a diamond target.
I know for a fact that Arkansas State Park, has diamond bearing gravels and ores.
I learned that the fe-male end of a plugged in extension cord is resonating a enhancement frequency, thru earth grounding.
I also learned that when I place the cord end, over an Element, on the map, it enhances the map connection.
I can use my diamond dust, or my diamond frequency stone, and it works.
If your a map Dowser, maybe it will help..

 

[dowser]

What I do notice is, if I'm really signaling into a map, it gets interfered with just like my regular Dowsing.
Neither work or both work. Frequency interference blocks me both ways.

 

[dowser]

It doesn't come natural.
I'm using 2 Crucifix, 3 stone, Master key enhancement. Along with the female end of the extension cord, plus Copper mesh over my forearms.
It's not a strong signal, we have to adapt to Dowse it.

 

[Red_desert]

Best way seen it explained was in a YouTube I watched... pendulum dowsing is by the 3rd eye, while L-rods use the heart chakra.

 

[audigger53]

It doesn't come natural.
I'm using 2 Crucifix, 3 stone, Master key enhancement. Along with the female end of the extension cord, plus Copper mesh over my forearms.
It's not a strong signal, we have to adapt to Dowse it.

I hope your still alive. The main problem I have had with LRL's is too many signals! LOL That and finding out that the treasure you were looking for has already been found before. LOL I have asked questions to many of the manufactures and only one could give me any answers. That was Dell Winters as he actually used his in the field. IE Halo's, the outer edge to outer edge and the thickness of the halo. I found that the outside edge to opposite outside edge was to be split by half for the depth of the target. But no one could tell me what the thickness of the Halo meant! Size of the target? Most were used to find coins! Not large objects, IMHO.
Why would anyone spend 100's-1,000's of dollars to find coins? I can see Metal Detectors for coins, but not for large finds.

 

[dowser]

I hope your still alive. The main problem I have had with LRL's is too many signals! LOL That and finding out that the treasure you were looking for has already been found before. LOL I have asked questions to many of the manufactures and only one could give me any answers. That was Dell Winters as he actually used his in the field. IE Halo's, the outer edge to outer edge and the thickness of the halo. I found that the outside edge to opposite outside edge was to be split by half for the depth of the target. But no one could tell me what the thickness of the Halo meant! Size of the target? Most were used to find coins! Not large objects, IMHO.
Why would anyone spend 100's-1,000's of dollars to find coins? I can see Metal Detectors for coins, but not for large finds.

I'm not sure what you mean, "too many signals", are you using specific Element frequencies?
This is the way I learned and used about depth Halo, I had bought an Omni-range master molecular resonator.
The depth halo is a 45 degree angle representation from the depth of the target, half strength signal.
Called a Halo but not necessarily a Halo, a representation of the peremiter.

 

[dowser]

If you Dowse a 10 ft long Cannon 5 ft down, it would Dowse 5 ft halo from the ends and a 5 ft halo from the sides.

 

[Prairie Gazingfox]

I hope your still alive. The main problem I have had with LRL's is too many signals! LOL That and finding out that the treasure you were looking for has already been found before. LOL I have asked questions to many of the manufactures and only one could give me any answers. That was Dell Winters as he actually used his in the field. IE Halo's, the outer edge to outer edge and the thickness of the halo. I found that the outside edge to opposite outside edge was to be split by half for the depth of the target. But no one could tell me what the thickness of the Halo meant! Size of the target? Most were used to find coins! Not large objects, IMHO.
Why would anyone spend 100's-1,000's of dollars to find coins? I can see Metal Detectors for coins, but not for large finds.

I believe the numerous signals are due to the Emanation of the stones ( those that are completely under the surface). I have found especially deceptive a type of relative well mineralized fist-size up to about 2.5 fists - size stones that are 12 to 18 inches deep. And the most important factor is that they are standing alone ( at same depth ; not necessarily lack of smaller or similar size stones say 8 inches deeper and kind of slightly diagonally underneath the former )
Also gravel size VERY mineralized stones But a bunch of small clusters of them that are 2 feet or almost deep and are within about 5 feet from Above the surface bunch of Boulders ( half submerged ).
In this case the muneralized Clusters have Grey color metals as Integral parts and each metal is well represented, but they also have Ag and Copper and Gold ( No matter how well represented within these mineralized gravel size stones )

So as foolish as it may sound, You may dowse these 2 feet depth clusters as An Extension of the Boulders above surface that's is closest in distance to them.....
But You don't know that you have Triangulated An Extension Of the identical metals within the Closest Boulder! You only find out that these underground ( relatively well centered( not Sporadically scattered in the soil space ) minerals Reinforce only what is emanating from the Boulder that is 5 feet away , only after you reach their depth!

 

[Prairie Gazingfox]

Here i have done delineating ( depth and also volume of container ) mental dowsing for 1 Spot i know has treasure, After I had been in the field and done in person physical plus mental triangulation.

I also have done this depth assessment and size assessment While in the field and results are almost the same.
For every depth while being in a room amd asking about it, i have used utmost concentration, yet trying to be relaxed!
Also every depth i have asked about more than 5 times while being in different rooms and even while listening to a song. Every time same results I get..
Small correction: I have Not Asked the Pendulum about size of container WHILE standing next to it in the field! Because results may get skewed due to my own psychological bias and based on whatever I observe around....