It was about couple years ago. I found this info reading one of the forums .....
Thanx for the info. And even if you
could remember the forum where you read that, and even if you
did have a link, here's what would probably happen: The "source" there would merely be someone saying "it's illegal" . Death penalty, etc.... And if you were to find the person who typed
that, and had asked him: "What is your source?", he too would probably answer: "
I read it on a forum somewhere".
And so on, and so forth back to permanent regression. The "links lead to links lead to links lead to...." . And in each case, it's someone simply making the statement. Pretty soon, it's impossible to put to rest. All the links just point to each other.
And if someone COULD eventually trace it back to an
actual law of any sort, it will probably be something catch-all. Like cultural heritage. Ie.: laws that deal with protected monuments, or shipwreck salvor, or exporting gold bars out of the country, etc....
To make an analogy: It would be similar to if someone 50 yrs. ago (back when detecting was in infancy here in the USA) came to the USA and started asking purist archies or lawyers: "Can I detect in the USA?" They might get an earful about ARPA. Or lost & found laws. Or tax laws, or .... some such
"answer to your pressing question" type thing. And that person goes back home, and issues dire warnings: "
Don't bother detecting in the USA, as it's highly illegal". That gets picked up on links. Which lead to links. Which leads to links. And before long, all the old-timers are looking around scratching their heads saying "since when ?"
I have a few case-examples of this evolution on a national scale. And thus whenever I read something dire about a country supposedly off-limits, border-to-border, I sometimes wonder "says who?" & "where is this written" ?