Millions at stake in dinosaur fight: Are fossils minerals?

jeff of pa

Super Moderator
⛭ Moderator
🥇 Charter Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2003
Messages
90,061
Reaction score
65,688
Golden Thread
2
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
1
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
FILE - In this Nov.14, 2013, file photo, one of two "dueling dinosaurs" fossils is displayed in New York. In an ongoing court case over the ownership of the fossils, the Montana Supreme Court heard arguments in Helena, Mont., Thursday, Nov. 7, 2019, over whether fossils are part of a property's surface estate or mineral estate in the case of split ownership. (AP Photo/Seth Weinig, File)

000aaa.webp

https://apnews.com/0a91b4b58822491797b828f3deca3b29
 

That is interesting.

Sharp on the part of the museum rep to ask if they had legal ownership. Don't want to loose a $6M investment to some court squabble.
 

We had this drilled into our brains in every geology class in college,
a mineral is a naturally occurring nonorganic substance with a definite chemical composition...
a fossil would not fall under this category since it is a composite of various minerals cemented together
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom