vferrari
Silver Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2015
- Messages
- 4,910
- Reaction score
- 8,378
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Near Ground Zero for Insanity
- Detector(s) used
- XP Deus with HF/x35 Coils and Mi6 Pinpointer/ML Equinox 600/800/ML Tarsacci MDT 8000 GPX 4800/Garrett ATX/Fisher F75 DST/Tek G2+/Delta/Whites MXT/Nokta Simplex/Garrett Carrot
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
When I am trying to think something through,... I tend to look at odds.
So,.......
what are the odds that the buyer is going to get in the water deep enough that the housing is submerged?
In a sense,
"of all the units sold, what are the odds the owner is going to use it solely as land Machine?
What are the odds that the owner will do some shoreline and shallow water searching?
100% is all sold
Use is land or shallow water, (coil and lower submerged, not the housing), unknown %
Percent of users that take the unit diving, snorkeling, or chest high, etc unknown %
Until you figure in "the odds",....."the percent", look at the numbers, do the math,......
Until you do that, you're just guessing.
You are right, we don't know the percentage of users who are actually regularly using their machines in the water. What I DO know is that those who have leakage problems are: (1) usually experiencing the problem after the first or second submersion and (2) not complaining again about leakage after they get their machine replaced. I DO know that the repair center supervisor/owner is seeing a return for repair rate for ALL reasons (not just flooding) of less than 1%. I DO know that myself and several others here have used their machines in the water without incident and that some have repeatedly used theirs at depth without incident. I DO know that ML has stood behind their machine and honored the warranty repair in every instance of flooding reported here and elsewhere regardless of circumstance (dropped on the rocks, etc.).
Those are facts that give me confidence that the issue appears to be related to factory manufacturing quality vs. design and that they may have gotten a handle on that issue because the replacement units generally appear to be sound. I conclude, based on the facts, that if I test the unit the way I intend to use it in the water and don't experience the problem, I likely won't have an issue beyond the warranty period unless I myself damage the seals, because this doesn't appear to be a problem that causes watertight integrity to degrade with time as long as you do what is necessary to protect the machine from the rigors of salt water usage (rinse thoroughly after use, etc). In other words, if I verify the machine works as intended during the warranty period and it survives, I have high confidence that machine will continue to be watertight beyond the warranty period if I don't subject it to damage.
So you can continue to stir the pot or logically look at the facts. Either way, I am not personally loosing sleep over this, especially when I consider where detector prices are now headed with Simplex and Vanquish. I reckon I will be able to get a more caoable machine than Equinox for less money by the time my Equinox is out of warranty.
Last edited: