Eu_citzen
Gold Member
- #1
Thread Owner
I will state that my experience is based on Sweden and low mineralization.
We begin with the good stuff: (what good side the machine has)
1. Sizing is correct down to about 8" on a coins sized object
2. Deep machine when set up right
3. Sturdy strong construction
4. Big display, helps those with poor vision
5. tough coils, they take a beating
6. pinpoint is right on after some practice
Now I come into the bad stuff:
1. Balance sucks, those who think the Explorer II was heavy shouldn't even think about this one
2. The epoxy filled coils adds unnecessary weight
3. Disc is very jumpy and the 24 notches represent targets poorly when the area has many years of history.
4. Over priced in my opinion.
I think that sums up my thoughts quite well.
Also I think it is better suited as a relic machine in comparison to the DFX.
The Explorer might have an edge on it there though, it may be better then the GTI, yet to be confirmed as my relic hunting experience is limited to a few times only.
Depth wise I think the Explorer II and the GTI are close together.
But sensitivity to small targets in discrimination mode is by far superior on the DFX and the Explorer.
(GTI could gain more by increasing sens and/or using true all metal, neither is really practical at my place)
And yes I think the Explorer feels lighter, not saying it is but it certainly feels like it.
Good Hunting!
Eu
We begin with the good stuff: (what good side the machine has)
1. Sizing is correct down to about 8" on a coins sized object
2. Deep machine when set up right
3. Sturdy strong construction
4. Big display, helps those with poor vision
5. tough coils, they take a beating
6. pinpoint is right on after some practice
Now I come into the bad stuff:
1. Balance sucks, those who think the Explorer II was heavy shouldn't even think about this one
2. The epoxy filled coils adds unnecessary weight
3. Disc is very jumpy and the 24 notches represent targets poorly when the area has many years of history.
4. Over priced in my opinion.
I think that sums up my thoughts quite well.
Also I think it is better suited as a relic machine in comparison to the DFX.
The Explorer might have an edge on it there though, it may be better then the GTI, yet to be confirmed as my relic hunting experience is limited to a few times only.
Depth wise I think the Explorer II and the GTI are close together.
But sensitivity to small targets in discrimination mode is by far superior on the DFX and the Explorer.
(GTI could gain more by increasing sens and/or using true all metal, neither is really practical at my place)
And yes I think the Explorer feels lighter, not saying it is but it certainly feels like it.
Good Hunting!
Eu