A 5x8 is my primary coil in trashy areas ,parks ect..
It seems like much better separation .if separation is the right word , than the 8.5x11 .
Now that larger (stock) coil is great to cover more ground when there are less targets. Enough to me to not warrant a bigger coil.
A sniper coil would help more under bleachers or along fence edges but the 5x8 in the open can squeak out mixed stuff pretty good with tight swings or wiggles on multiple or iffy targets.. Recoveries with the 5x8 along fence edges and guardrails hint ,to me anyway ,that other detectorists are missing those edges. A sniper might be even better ,but I'm content getting as close as I do.
IF you are a patient gridder of sites and they are hard trashed and you don't want to remove everything , and want to try and cherry pick instead..a sniper coil seems the way to go.
Had I not bought a pair of 350's with two coils each before the AT-Pro was proven .....an AT-Pro would have been a first choice as an upgrade from my other Ace detector..
I've hunted a park a couple times using a 350 with a fellow detectorist met there with an AT-Pro and I'll give him a slight edge in original confirmed hits on potential targets faster , and better I.D. at max. depth..(we lean towards coins mostly) but the AT-Pro is going to whup the 350 of course if the detectors features alone are compared.
We both miss stuff the other finds , and the user matters as well as what we are willing to dig on a certain day. .
Too I've watched him do the same wiggle on iffy deeper targets repeatedly. He has me beat by totals/finds ,but has put in many more hours in that park also.
Were I to pursue an AT-Pro I'd want a smaller than stock coil also ,though not a sniper coil, ..but that's me and how I hunt.
There is a diamond (single stud/diamond) earring on a trashed site I've ignored.
It's a very public place and would be hours of detecting with out the other earring to test on.
Perhaps a sniper coil would help but the diamond would be returned ,knowing the owner anyways.
Have fun deciding.
