boogeyman
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2006
- Messages
- 5,016
- Reaction score
- 4,404
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Detector(s) used
- WHITES, MINELAB, Garrett
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Wow! Tom! That didn't take long. What if what if blah blah......... Guess I should've explained a little better. I'm not having a debate with these people, not starting a confrontation just responding by stating facts in a factual manner & tone of voice to when they step out of the boundary of their authority. There's no "that you DID win this defiant "cite me" battle." I have won over & over period no debate! My as you call it battle with the County of Orange, Ca. ended up with me $39,900 plus court costs etc richer. More & more these individuals feel they have more authority than they in fact have. The quickest cleanest way to end it is to put it into their head it's possibly going to cost them their job, their income etc. Sorry Tom I wouldn't suggest this to other Tneters if would lead them to harm. You're talking theory & what ifs. I'm talking facts actual experiences. That was the one instance he didn't just walk away. All the rest (over 20) ended up just walking off with a remark. Now that you mention it! I actually ended up being friends with one of these folks and was able to let her know the city was laying off in her dept. It affected my agency, so she could transfer thus saving her job. Respect works both ways.boogeyman, as my reputation on T'net shows: I'm as brazen and ballsy non-skittish as they come. HOWEVER, I would still not employ the "in-your-face" defiance that you suggest. I do agree that you're not doing anything wrong (I too consider our hobby innocuous and harmless). However, I would NEVER subject myself to a debate of semantics over this. For 2 reasons:
1) They can say that the mere act of your target retrieval (no matter how you do it) constitutes "alter" "deface" "dig", etc.... Or can invoke the prohibitions on "harvest", "remove", "take", etc.... And let's be honest boogeyman, do you really think you're going to win that battle ? Yes I agree we do not fall afoul of those things. But just saying that if someone gets mad, you're going to look mighty silly trying to back-pedal away with that screwdriver or lesche in your hand. Because in THEIR mind's eyes, even if you eventually prove you'll "leave no trace", yet .... they will just think this opens the pandora's box for every other yahoo, that might not be so neat, to likewise go out there. Why subject yourself to this ?
2) Let's just say for a minute that you DID win this defiant "cite me" battle. Well guess what can then happen? They might just dream up a specific "no detecting" rule now, to close this loophole in wording.
So better that you don't swat hornet's nests, and pick lower traffic times when any potential busy-body isn't around, in the first place![]()
Once again Tommy. Thanks for playing! Go back to skulking around the parks at night and walking on eggshells going oohhh don't want to upset anyone. If you're right and the law is on your side and you have a good grip on the law, stand up like a man and apply that knowledge!
You take care now & have yourself a wonderful day!
Last edited: