bigscoop
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 13,541
- Reaction score
- 9,086
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Wherever there be treasure!
- Detector(s) used
- Older blue Excal with full mods, Equinox 800.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
Kip Wagner, Mel Fisher, do you think they knew the source of the coins they were finding when they started finding them? No, they didn't. They had no idea what they had discovered until they finally chose the correct avenue in their research, this eventually leading them to a man in the Spanish archives and that now famous B. Roman's map. Up until then their research was constantly pursuing different course, their conclusions constantly changing face. This is reality. Most discoveries of this nature were the product of this same type of course.
But in all of these discoveries there exist one common, at some point it was discovered that these lost treasures, “did in fact exist.” And how did they know this? Because they kept pursuing all course of research until they discovered these truths, this research generally taking years and generally relying on the previous works,documents and records of others.
Today, in regards to the Beale mystery, I only see a handful of researchers breaking new ground and entertaining alternate possibilities, most of these once hopefuls now either too set in their unfounded conclusions or completely worn out from the prior mental pursuits that still leave their cup empty. And I say “unfounded conclusions” because that's what they are, the obvious holes in their theories allowed to exist because new avenue means the changing of course, yet again, and often a change of course that is in a different direction then what they desire to maintain. It is a proposition of tossing out one love child to begin the long raising of another. Yet, as it were, the old course and conclusions can't answer all the required questions and the required connections are left to the wind.
I have often been criticized for changing course and direction and opinion, thank god! At least I know I'm doing what is required and pursuing my research right.
"If there is an alternate truth out there I will find it, even if I have to change course and opinion yet again, and again." I'm apparently in that rare group that sees or feels no shame in it.
But in all of these discoveries there exist one common, at some point it was discovered that these lost treasures, “did in fact exist.” And how did they know this? Because they kept pursuing all course of research until they discovered these truths, this research generally taking years and generally relying on the previous works,documents and records of others.
Today, in regards to the Beale mystery, I only see a handful of researchers breaking new ground and entertaining alternate possibilities, most of these once hopefuls now either too set in their unfounded conclusions or completely worn out from the prior mental pursuits that still leave their cup empty. And I say “unfounded conclusions” because that's what they are, the obvious holes in their theories allowed to exist because new avenue means the changing of course, yet again, and often a change of course that is in a different direction then what they desire to maintain. It is a proposition of tossing out one love child to begin the long raising of another. Yet, as it were, the old course and conclusions can't answer all the required questions and the required connections are left to the wind.
I have often been criticized for changing course and direction and opinion, thank god! At least I know I'm doing what is required and pursuing my research right.
"If there is an alternate truth out there I will find it, even if I have to change course and opinion yet again, and again." I'm apparently in that rare group that sees or feels no shame in it.
