no offense taken vferrari. not at all and i appreciate your detailed response. using the logic embedded in your reply, it also therefore follows that a"lurker" who read your post warning people about the serious legal matter that detecting in a place like yellowstone would/could be, may infer that we are indeed discussing detecting in Yellowstone. my reply to your reply was merely aimed at clarifying that we were not discussing detecting in yellowstone. the "hunting" i believe that was 1st mentioned involved hunting grizz with the piranha shovel, a joking response to my stating that the shovel is effective to protect oneself from grizz (which I, of course, realize is not true, having spent much time myself in grizz country up there. the best defense is either bear spray or simply to play dead and hope for the best). i agree, the joking probably need be more clearly labeled as such so as not to give lurkers or those simply not following every word to the letter the wrong idea. in my own defense, i usually use the

icon when i am joking. i think i probably did.

again, no offense taken or meant to be given. I know others were also involved in the multiple posts related to "hunting" in yellowstone and I do not intend to speak for all those involved, only myself. let's get back discussing relics...