uniface
Silver Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,216
- Reaction score
- 2,905
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Central Pennsylvania
- Primary Interest:
- Other
is a procedure that has provoked no little debate/disagreement here in years past -- largely because if it is indeed a valid method of determining the age (etc.) of a flint (or other) artifact, then authentication services like Insight's merit serious reconsideration by people who like to scoff at it. (It has long since been the gold standard of flint identification).
In this case it's being used to evaluate artifacts older than those dealt with here in North America, and proving its value once again:
phys.org
www.phys.org/news/2020-10-ancient-hominins-stone-tools.html
In this case it's being used to evaluate artifacts older than those dealt with here in North America, and proving its value once again:

Ancient hominins used fire to make stone tools
Human ancestors not only knew how to use fire, they also developed sophisticated technologies for making tools. Researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science recently employed cutting-edge technologies of their own to take a fresh look at a collection of stone tools. Their results suggest...
www.phys.org/news/2020-10-ancient-hominins-stone-tools.html
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote
0