What's new

"Rare Nabataean Ritual Signal – Goddess Al-Uzza Appears from Satellite

أريد خبير آثار
باختصار، العلامة الموجودة على الأقمار الصناعية تخبرني عن علامة على الأرض.
 
باختصار، العلامة الموجودة على الأقمار الصناعية الشاملة عن العلامة على الأرض.
أي أن صور رأس الغوريلا عبر الأقمار الصناعية وجدت رأس الفرس على الأرض.
 
أي أن صور رأس الغوريلا عبر الأقمار الصناعية وجدت رأس الفرس على الأرض.
أي أن صور ملكة الأنباط على الأقمار الصناعية وجدت رأس نسر على الأرض.
 
أي أن صور ملكة الأنباط على الأقمار الصناعية وجدت رأس نسر على الأرض.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250810_005709_com.android.gallery3d.webp
    Screenshot_20250810_005709_com.android.gallery3d.webp
    318.7 KB · Views: 41
هذه العلامات النادرة ليس لها أي تشابه، أي أنها فريدة من نوعها.
أنصحك أن تسأل عالم آثار مؤهلًا، وليس أي عالم آثار.
 
أنصحك أن تسأل عالم الصدمة الكافي، وليس أي عالم الصدمة.
لا يزال لدي الكثير مما يثير دهشة عالم الآثار، وهي العلامات الأكثر قيمة ونادرة، ولكن عليه أن يدفع الكثير ليصل إلى ذلك.
 
I know I could use Google Translate to read this stuff, but in my opinion it is up to the person posting to post in English which is that standard language for this forum.
 
I came across this unique natural rock formation that strongly resembles a crowned female face carved in profile. The facial features, including the nose, lips, and eye socket, appear intentionally shaped or at least symbolically significant. Given the stylistic and symbolic aspects, this may represent al-‘Uzzā, a pre-Islamic goddess revered in Nabataean and Arabian cultures. The presence of such iconography in natural or sculpted rock was not uncommon in sacred areas or pilgrimage routes.

I’d appreciate your input on whether this seems naturally weathered, anthropomorphically shaped by intention, or symbolic in any cultural/historical context. No exact location will be provided, but the area is known for Nabataean activity.

Thanks in advance.
Maybe you can draw it out like this ? I found these in my area I have larger ones as well but I’ll start with this because I can’t see what you’re looking at ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7530.webp
    IMG_7530.webp
    860.9 KB · Views: 40
  • IMG_7551.webp
    IMG_7551.webp
    100.7 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_7550.webp
    IMG_7550.webp
    56.2 KB · Views: 40
I came across this unique natural rock formation that strongly resembles a crowned female face carved in profile. The facial features, including the nose, lips, and eye socket, appear intentionally shaped or at least symbolically significant. Given the stylistic and symbolic aspects, this may represent al-‘Uzzā, a pre-Islamic goddess revered in Nabataean and Arabian cultures. The presence of such iconography in natural or sculpted rock was not uncommon in sacred areas or pilgrimage routes.

I’d appreciate your input on whether this seems naturally weathered, anthropomorphically shaped by intention, or symbolic in any cultural/historical context. No exact location will be provided, but the area is known for Nabataean activity.

Thanks in advance.
Please take a look at this as well genesh and Kaali in one and another a man reaching for his god or at least a big face
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7771.webp
    IMG_7771.webp
    88.4 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG_7763.webp
    IMG_7763.webp
    67.8 KB · Views: 38
  • IMG_7620.webp
    IMG_7620.webp
    198.1 KB · Views: 42
  • att.h8_HzeL5hth7ytumkxAPIPGlRy05V3u1AXvf-FYC5uM.webp
    att.h8_HzeL5hth7ytumkxAPIPGlRy05V3u1AXvf-FYC5uM.webp
    41.2 KB · Views: 42
Please take a look at this as well genesh and Kaali in one and another a man reaching for his god or at least a big face
You're kidding, right? You aren't seriously suggesting a man, men, or all of humanity, intentionally arranged the continents? I don't even see any recognizable shapes, but even if I did, it certainly wasn't man that put it there.
 
You're kidding, right? You aren't seriously suggesting a man, men, or all of humanity, intentionally arranged the continents? I don't even see any recognizable shapes, but even if I did, it certainly wasn't man that put it there.
Well kidding me isn’t a good way to start a conversation is it? I did not suggest anything just pointed out similarities. I do not believe man can rearrange continents but I do know we adjust shorelines I do know that man had at some point the ability to be elevated up enough to draw large things in the sand and also have the ability to use the shapes around them to create characters in there beliefs. Coming at people with knee jerk answers is no way to help. Just look like like you have no communication skills

As far as you not recognizing shapes or men Stems probably from close mindedness and patience and knowledge some other peoples religious characters.
I’m new to this site and kinda see a lot of knee jerk reactions. I hope I can get some god conversation that could help rather then shame.
 
Coming at people with knee jerk answers is no way to help. Just look like like you have no communication skills
I'm not trying to shame you, and if there's lack of communication here, it's from both directions. You posted satellite photos and said there were images in them. The context of the thread was other rock formations that had presumably been made that way by man. My assumption was that therefore you were continuing in that same vein, and were suggesting that the continental outlines shown were intentionally made that way to be a recognizable shape. My mind, closed or not, sees no shape in the outlines and nobody anywhere has ever suggested that mankind shaped the outlines of the continents. Thus, my "you've got to be kidding" was a reaction that I am confident most people reading this thread would have had, even if they didn't say so.

I hope I can get some god conversation that could help rather then shame.
It wasn't intended to shame you, merely to point out the absurdity of the idea that continents were shaped to represent anything in particular. There is a human tendency to want to see patterns, even when there really aren't any, or at least not intentional ones. It's called pareidolia. It's not a flaw or a shame or anything like that, it's just a thing that happens, and can happen to anyone. I think that's what you've got going on here.
 
I'm not trying to shame you, and if there's lack of communication here, it's from both directions. You posted satellite photos and said there were images in them. The context of the thread was other rock formations that had presumably been made that way by man. My assumption was that therefore you were continuing in that same vein, and were suggesting that the continental outlines shown were intentionally made that way to be a recognizable shape. My mind, closed or not, sees no shape in the outlines and nobody anywhere has ever suggested that mankind shaped the outlines of the continents. Thus, my "you've got to be kidding" was a reaction that I am confident most people reading this thread would have had, even if they didn't say so.


It wasn't intended to shame you, merely to point out the absurdity of the idea that continents were shaped to represent anything in particular. There is a human tendency to want to see patterns, even when there really aren't any, or at least not intentional ones. It's called pareidolia. It's not a flaw or a shame or anything like that, it's just a thing that happens, and can happen to anyone. I think that's what you've got going on here.
I appreciate your response thank you.
I tend to try and match people’s responses without being to aggressive or what ever so thank you for not just shutting me down.
I do have to say with the communication part I was trying to get a conversation open with the original post ..person 🥴
I do have a group of people who have a good conversation about this phenomenon paradolia and ancient art. I have taken the path of yes it’s paradoilia (forgive my spelling if it’s wrong ) I’m on my phone

Any way of your open to discuss it I would really like to talk and get people opinion beyond the people who are hard nosed into it not to label you but I feel your hard nosed against it ? I respect it and like to work with people over stupid crap like this because of there is a middle ground it will
Help both sides and maybe help put some peoples mind at ease instead of flat out telling them there completely wrong. I’m sure at some point in our history of science people were told there is no way and found out later that would have been a great thing to know existed. Like say, dinosaurs or ancient civilizations in South America probably dumb ones but a start.? lol I am always open to learn more as well

Any way thank you again for being candid. Respect to you
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom