Rediscovered English Sterling

tamrock

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
15,838
Reaction score
32,638
Golden Thread
0
Location
Colorado
Detector(s) used
Bounty Hunter Tracker IV
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I was putting away a recent find in a box and thought I'd pull out a few of my thrifty finds to review. I came across this beauty. I can not recall when, where and how much I gave for it, but I'm pretty sure it would've have been much. I cleaned it up some and really noticed how beautiful and well made a piece of English sterling it is. It's a Christaning cup I believe and is hallmarked for London, dated 1901. The maker is Martin Hall & Co. with the mark they used after 1880. It has a nice weight of 179 grams.
 

Attachments

  • 20230127_171638.webp
    20230127_171638.webp
    340.4 KB · Views: 81
  • 20230127_171627.webp
    20230127_171627.webp
    331.4 KB · Views: 79
  • 20230127_171649.webp
    20230127_171649.webp
    364.4 KB · Views: 76
  • 20230127_171702.webp
    20230127_171702.webp
    432.9 KB · Views: 80
  • 20230127_172340.webp
    20230127_172340.webp
    258.1 KB · Views: 83
Very nice Tamrock. Christening mug it is, and you’re probably looking at a couple of hundred dollars there.

It’s not from 1901 though. The hallmarks are for 1881 London assay. Note that a 1901 date letter would be lower case ‘f’ and in a different cartouche. Also, 1901 silver wouldn’t have a duty mark (Victoria’s head).

Date Letter.jpg


You have the maker correct but note that it should be written with an apostrophe after ‘Martin’ as: “Martin, Hall & Co.” since the partnership was Richard Martin & Ebenezer Hall (the RM over EH mark in a lozenge was registered January 1880). That’s a Sheffield maker, despite the London hallmark. Not unusual, especially for makers that also had a showroom in London.
 

Last edited:
Very nice Tamrock. Christening mug it is, and you’re probably looking at a couple of hundred dollars there.

It’s not from 1901 though. The hallmarks are for 1881 London assay. Note that a 1901 date letter would be lower case ‘f’ and in a different cartouche. Also, 1901 silver wouldn’t have a duty mark (Victoria’s head).

View attachment 2066801

You have the maker correct but note that it should be written with an apostrophe after ‘Martin’ as: “Martin, Hall & Co.” since the partnership was Richard Martin & Ebenezer Hall (the RM over EH mark in a lozenge was registered January 1880). That’s a Sheffield maker, despite the London hallmark. Not unusual, especially for makers that also had a showroom in London.
Thank you, Milord. Seems I found the corresponding date mark, but looked down the wrong colum.
 

Attachments

  • dlLondon.webp
    dlLondon.webp
    24.5 KB · Views: 32

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom