I'm sorry but you've just not done your research. All I see are a lot of whats ifs and badly timed "buyins" to justify your reasoning. Your example is a great one for why trying to buy-in is such a gamble which has already been discussed in previous posts. I can easily say that those who bought silver in the early 70s and sold in early 2011 made off with the best investment in history. You see why that is all unbased and not a valid rebuttal? The point is you think silver is only valuable if it's got a high dollar amount attached to it. Thats the classic thinking of someone who does not understand what AU and AG are. They ARE the value. During the collapse of the Zimbabwe fiat currency some years ago, I wouldn't have sold my AG for trillions of their dollars. It does not matter at what price you could sell PMs the paper currency in question is worthless. Your flawed assumption is that AG is what has been changing value when it's only the dollar (aka fiat) that has been changing. 1oz of AG is always 1oz of AG. There is a reason why its so easy to sell your AG.
During every economic collapse (not social collapse) throughout history there has always been one thing that has consistently preserved wealth. Hmmm I wonder what it could be?
Also regarding hoarding ammo, food etc. As i mentioned in my first post, I'm talking about a financial collapse. Not social collapse. There is a very big difference.
You can speculate about AG being worth only pennies (I prefer the term cents) 75 years from now based on nothing but your opinion or you can look at the the history of the dollar and realize that any sort of investment you've made in the Dollar has been a complete loss. It's actually the Dollar that is now worth mere "pennies" than what it was years ago. AG is a much better inheritance to leave for my posterity 75 years from now. History and economics are not wrong.
<img src="http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=1030655"/>