fowledup
Silver Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,757
- Reaction score
- 5,163
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Northern California
- Detector(s) used
- Whites GMT V/SAT
- Primary Interest:
- Prospecting
As SB637 glides on through the halls and committees of the state capital, everyone should read this report summary from a previous pilot program, a real tangible program that used a common sense approach and provided a real solution with proven results. This actually happened it was not a theory, conjecture, or a false promise made by an outfit with no practical experience. Then go ask your government officials- What happened? Why was a program with real results at no cost to the taxpayer, a program with no boundaries or limitations not supported and embraced.
https://yosemite.epa.gov/opei/innovcat.nsf/PrintTemplate/00D2847EA4B586BC852572DC006F8EE7
Below is an excerpt from the report, take notice of the agency under "Describe any lessons learned", Keeping whose behind 637 in mind, what happened to our champion?
ARCHIVE
Reasons For Archiving:
Complete Date:
Project completed – no more updates
June 2002
What environmental gains / changes / effects did the project produce (before it was archived/before it ended):
Over 300 pounds of mercury was collected from recreational gold miners and other people who brought mercury to collection events.
How would you describe the project?
Very Successful
What obstacles/difficulties did the project face and how did these impact the project's success?
It took a long time to determine the regulations applicable to a mercury collection program and to reach agreement with the state on the regulatory interpretation of RCRA.
Describe any lessons learned:
A clear champion, in this case at the state water agency, was a key to getting the program implemented.
Do you have any suggestions for readers if they choose to try to repeat the project in the future?
Make sure that all regulations are understood as early in the process as possible.
https://yosemite.epa.gov/opei/innovcat.nsf/PrintTemplate/00D2847EA4B586BC852572DC006F8EE7
Below is an excerpt from the report, take notice of the agency under "Describe any lessons learned", Keeping whose behind 637 in mind, what happened to our champion?
ARCHIVE
Reasons For Archiving:
Complete Date:
Project completed – no more updates
June 2002
What environmental gains / changes / effects did the project produce (before it was archived/before it ended):
Over 300 pounds of mercury was collected from recreational gold miners and other people who brought mercury to collection events.
How would you describe the project?
Very Successful
What obstacles/difficulties did the project face and how did these impact the project's success?
It took a long time to determine the regulations applicable to a mercury collection program and to reach agreement with the state on the regulatory interpretation of RCRA.
Describe any lessons learned:
A clear champion, in this case at the state water agency, was a key to getting the program implemented.
Do you have any suggestions for readers if they choose to try to repeat the project in the future?
Make sure that all regulations are understood as early in the process as possible.
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Upvote
0