fowledup
Silver Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,757
- Reaction score
- 5,163
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Northern California
- Detector(s) used
- Whites GMT V/SAT
- Primary Interest:
- Prospecting
SB 209 is on the agenda for MONDAY, JULY 13TH IN SACRAMENTO.
209 is further regulation on mining. Here is a letter from TSF being sent to the committee:
July 6, 2015
Chairman Das Williams
California State Assembly Natural Resources Committee
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: (916) 319-2092
Re: Support SB 209
Dear Honorable Assemblymember Williams,
I am writing to urge your support for passage of SB 209, a bill to improve enforcement of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) by lead agencies. The bill will be heard next Monday, July 13 in the Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Reform of SMARA is a top priority for the Governor, conservation organizations and community members that live around or on active mines. This bill is the topic of a “stakeholder process” that was started in the Governor’s Conference Room on Monday March 16, 2015. Ideas that emerge from these meetings that will strengthen and support consistent enforcement of SMARA by lead agencies will be incorporated into SB 209.
The State has an interest in regulating mining to ensure that a mine is operated in compliance with its locally issued permit, which protects the State’s water and air from contamination, and to ensure that when the mine ceases operation it is remediated to be ready for a beneficial end use. Prior to SMARA’s enactment in 1975, mines were not required to undergo reclamation at the end of operation, and as a result California has 47,000 un-reclaimed, abandoned legacy mines that pose a serious threat to the health and safety of all Californians.
SB 209 is a good start to addressing these issues. We ask for your “aye” vote on this bill.
Sincerely,
Izzy Martin
____________________________________________
Obviously we want miners voices heard at this hearing. Please consider writing and faxing your own version of the letter. Mellisa's version is here:
July 6, 2015
Chairman Das Williams
California State Assembly Natural Resources Committee
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: (916) 319-2092
Re: Oppose SB 209
Dear Honorable Assemblymember Williams,
I am writing to encourage your opposition to passage of SB 209, an unnecessary bill having to do with enforcement of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) by lead agencies.
The bill will be heard next Monday, July 13 in the Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Reform of SMARA is not necessary. This bill is just another strong arm tactic of environmental groups like The Sierra Fund who can't seem to leave California alone. I seriously doubt 'lead agencies' need the busybodies who wrote SB 209 involved in their business and how they operate their agents and agencies.
Through SMARA, the State is already regulating mining to ensure that a mine is operated in compliance with its locally issued permit, which protects the State’s water and air from contamination, and ensures that when the mine ceases operation it is remediated to be ready for a beneficial end use.
SB 209 is a waste of time, energy, and money. I ask for your “no” vote on this bill.
Sincerely,
Mellisa Fernandez
209 is further regulation on mining. Here is a letter from TSF being sent to the committee:
July 6, 2015
Chairman Das Williams
California State Assembly Natural Resources Committee
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: (916) 319-2092
Re: Support SB 209
Dear Honorable Assemblymember Williams,
I am writing to urge your support for passage of SB 209, a bill to improve enforcement of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) by lead agencies. The bill will be heard next Monday, July 13 in the Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Reform of SMARA is a top priority for the Governor, conservation organizations and community members that live around or on active mines. This bill is the topic of a “stakeholder process” that was started in the Governor’s Conference Room on Monday March 16, 2015. Ideas that emerge from these meetings that will strengthen and support consistent enforcement of SMARA by lead agencies will be incorporated into SB 209.
The State has an interest in regulating mining to ensure that a mine is operated in compliance with its locally issued permit, which protects the State’s water and air from contamination, and to ensure that when the mine ceases operation it is remediated to be ready for a beneficial end use. Prior to SMARA’s enactment in 1975, mines were not required to undergo reclamation at the end of operation, and as a result California has 47,000 un-reclaimed, abandoned legacy mines that pose a serious threat to the health and safety of all Californians.
SB 209 is a good start to addressing these issues. We ask for your “aye” vote on this bill.
Sincerely,
Izzy Martin
____________________________________________
Obviously we want miners voices heard at this hearing. Please consider writing and faxing your own version of the letter. Mellisa's version is here:
July 6, 2015
Chairman Das Williams
California State Assembly Natural Resources Committee
Sacramento, CA 95814
Fax: (916) 319-2092
Re: Oppose SB 209
Dear Honorable Assemblymember Williams,
I am writing to encourage your opposition to passage of SB 209, an unnecessary bill having to do with enforcement of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) by lead agencies.
The bill will be heard next Monday, July 13 in the Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Reform of SMARA is not necessary. This bill is just another strong arm tactic of environmental groups like The Sierra Fund who can't seem to leave California alone. I seriously doubt 'lead agencies' need the busybodies who wrote SB 209 involved in their business and how they operate their agents and agencies.
Through SMARA, the State is already regulating mining to ensure that a mine is operated in compliance with its locally issued permit, which protects the State’s water and air from contamination, and ensures that when the mine ceases operation it is remediated to be ready for a beneficial end use.
SB 209 is a waste of time, energy, and money. I ask for your “no” vote on this bill.
Sincerely,
Mellisa Fernandez
Last edited:
Upvote
0