Set Up Dowsing Test

[David Ritchie]

Hello World,
Who all out there would like to see an honest,proper test set up so as to finally prove dowsing works using metal rod or rods, in other words a test for the conventional dowser, Anyone wanting to put an end to the SKEPTICS CAN DO JUST THAT by getting a proper test set up and I can show you just how to do that in a way that no skeptic could refuse without MAKING an IDIOT out of HIMSELF.
ANYONE WANTING TO HELP??
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[ClonedSIM]

Hello World,
Who all out there would like to see an honest,proper test set up so as to finally prove dowsing works using metal rod or rods, in other words a test for the conventional dowser, Anyone wanting to put an end to the SKEPTICS CAN DO JUST THAT by getting a proper test set up and I can show you just how to do that in a way that no skeptic could refuse without MAKING an IDIOT out of HIMSELF.
ANYONE WANTING TO HELP??
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

I predict that this post will be moved and possibly deleted, and I didn't even use rods to figure it out....

 

[David Ritchie]

Why would you say that
David Ritchie

 

[ClonedSIM]

Why would you say that
David Ritchie

Whoops! I thought I saw this post originally in the Locations board. My apologies.

 

[David Ritchie]

I see there are some out there that doesn't believe in dowsing [conventional dowsing using metal rod or rods].
If I could get some of these people to put their money where their mouth is I could get pretty darn rich.
How about burying 100 power lines cables and have ONLY ONE with power on it and LET'S SEE if I can tell you WHICH ONE has power on it USING nothing but my dowsing rod or rods
Now shut up or PUT UP, it's that simple, I'll give you what ever ODDS you WANT.
Carl David Ritchie
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

 

[ClonedSIM]

I see there are some out there that doesn't believe in dowsing [conventional dowsing using metal rod or rods].
If I could get some of these people to put their money where their mouth is I could get pretty darn rich.
How about burying 100 power lines cables and have ONLY ONE with power on it and LET'S SEE if I can tell you WHICH ONE has power on it USING nothing but my dowsing rod or rods
Now shut up or PUT UP, it's that simple, I'll give you what ever ODDS you WANT.
Carl David Ritchie
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

Carl and Randi are already putting their money where their mouths are. Why are you trying to drum up stake money when it's already there for the taking?

 

[David Ritchie]

Give me a break, I'm not talking about messing with people who won't even give an honest protocol test, FOR EXAMPLE, you say you dowse for buried items such as water in a water line and they say O.K. go over there on the floor and tell us which pipe has the water in it as a protocol test.
REMEMBER, I didn't say I dowsed for stuff lying on the floor, I said I dowsed for items BURIED.
Thanks For Your comment though, it's just another saying like Randi and the others

 

[ClonedSIM]

Give me a break, I'm not talking about messing with people who won't even give an honest protocol test, FOR EXAMPLE, you say you dowse for buried items such as water in a water line and they say O.K. go over there on the floor and tell us which pipe has the water in it as a protocol test.
REMEMBER, I didn't say I dowsed for stuff lying on the floor, I said I dowsed for items BURIED.
Thanks For Your comment though, it's just another saying like Randi and the others

Then tell Carl and Randi that you will take their tests with the condition that the targets be buried. Sounds like you're gearing up for the excuses we hear from the other dowsers around here.

If you want buried targets, then specify this to Randi in your application. If you want buried targets, then talk to Carl. He's very flexible and I'm sure could accommodate you.

 

[David Ritchie]

I'm been trying to talk to Carl for two days now and NO answers yet.
You don't think these people want to lose their money do you?
One guy on the forum was talking about power lines[whether or not you could dowse and tell whether or not they were live], I can dowse the power lines and tell you whethet or not the line is live or not.
If you buried 100 power cables in the same field and ONLY ONE WAS ALIVE I could tell you WHICH ONE at ANYTIME it is or not live.
Wouldn't that be a fine test
Best Regards
Carl David Ritchie
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

 

[ClonedSIM]

I'm been trying to talk to Carl for two days now and NO answers yet.
You don't think these people want to lose their money do you?
One guy on the forum was talking about power lines[whether or not you could dowse and tell whether or not they were live], I can dowse the power lines and tell you whethet or not the line is live or not.
If you buried 100 power cables in the same field and ONLY ONE WAS ALIVE I could tell you WHICH ONE at ANYTIME it is or not live.
Wouldn't that be a fine test
Best Regards
Carl David Ritchie
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

Oh, no doubt a fine test. In fact, I'd say that you could probably just use 10 or maybe 15 power lines in the test, rather than 100. I don't know if you've been to Randi's site or not, but if you can dowse the live line 80-100% of the time, then I would get an application filled out and over to them. It would probably take awhile, but if you're sure of your talent and could wait through the application process, it sounds like you'd stand a good shot at it.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hey David....The only thing they are interested in is talk....They will not agree to your test...They would lose the money and we know they will not do that...Art

 

[David Ritchie]

I agree 100%, they will not allow you to dowse for any public utilities as far as taking the test for their money, If they would I would already HAVE THEIR MONEY
Carl David Ritchie
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

 

[ClonedSIM]

I agree 100%, they will not allow you to dowse for any public utilities as far as taking the test for their money, If they would I would already HAVE THEIR MONEY
Carl David Ritchie
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

So don't dowse public utilities, actually set up a test with these specs. I can understand why they wouldn't allow a test using actual utility lines, as these are public knowledge.

It wouldn't be all that difficult to dig 15 or so trenches, run lines down each trench, and hook them into a fuse box attached to a generator, and flip only one switch per run. Have you tried this yourself?

 

[Jean310]

I agree 100%, they will not allow you to dowse for any public utilities as far as taking the test for their money, If they would I would already HAVE THEIR MONEY
Carl David Ritchie
cdrringo@sbcglobal.net

Please correct me if I'm wrong, David.

1.) You submitted your idea to Randi, to dowse public utilities and they objected based on the fact there is too much information available on public utilities? <<<<----that was a question to verify my understanding

2.) You would like to be tested ONLY on buried items, and these could be buried electrical lines (not public utility lines), or even buried items of your choosing (as long as they were not public utility items)? <<<<--- that's also a question

3.) This last idea of yours, to dowse buried items at a success rate of 100% has NOT been suggested to Randi or Carl, either by phone, email or a documented application?

I think 1. and 2. are true..... please verify.

If 3. is also true.... wouldn't it be fair to both Randi (and/or Carl) to make some type of formal application/suggestion to them before you accuse them on a public forum of not considering your proposed test setup?

 

[ClonedSIM]

.... wouldn't it be fair to both Randi (and/or Carl) to make some type of formal application/suggestion to them before you accuse them on a public forum of not considering your proposed test setup?

What an honest mind you have, Jean! I never even thought of this.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

jean
If 3. is also true.... wouldn't it be fair to both Randi (and/or Carl) to make some type of formal application/suggestion to them before you accuse them on a public forum of not considering your proposed test setup?
**************
He accused them of not considering? I thought that he only said that he had not heard from carl?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Open-minded research

I am a biologist, rather than a parapsychologist. I am convinced there is much we do not understand about living organisms. That is why I believe it is important to investigate phenomena such as the sense of being stared at and apparent telepathy in animals: we could learn more about animal nature and human nature by doing so. If forms of the sixth sense really exist, they are likely to have evolved in relation to biological needs, and to be widespread in the animal kingdom. To accept their existence would not involve the abandonment of science and reason, and the collapse of civilization as we know it; rather it would extend the scope of science and of evolutionary understanding.

By contrast, Marks claims that "a normal or ‘N’-theory interpretation (NIE) has proved to be a perfectly adequate explanation making any form of paranormal or ‘P’-theory interpretation (PIE) redundant or superfluous". But it is not enough merely to suggest an "NIE interpretation": such hypotheses need testing, and the ones Marks proposed have been refuted by the data. He is himself a good example of the "powerful effect of belief and selective attention".

Like Marks, I am a sceptic, but of a different kind. His scepticism is directed towards anything he regards as "paranormal", taking as normal that which lies within the limits of current scientific understanding.

My scepticism is directed towards the assumption that we know enough to proclaim what is possible and what is not.





Tropical Tramp
]