No worries Moesia. What lite my ire was a double post *since deleted, thank you* on my being wrong. That is flame to me. I've got no problem, and actually invite correction, for being wrong however at the time I could not ignore the double post nor do I ignore the statement that I am wrong. Complete thoughts. I made my statement rather plain and agree that it is reactionary however I stand by my point. Express a complete thought or just sit it out till you can. Not like I'm always here nor do I have tons of time nor do I wish to comment on everything I see here. Heck I left this thread alone for a long time waiting to see other opinions than mine, and see if they agreed with my thinking or not. Its a group effort in my thought and not something I wish to dominate. Just share in and learn. Think we are square on that myself. You still owe me an explanation on why I'm wrong. Nuff said.
EU I can understand the though of a mafic type stone but I dont see the feldspar and the break appears fresh. The rind suggests granitoid to however it appears greening in the rind and other similarly colored dark spots on the outside suggest the interior coloration is true. It also appears to be fairly porous. High sulfide does not generally lend to greens however manganese will and thats not typical to mafic or most granatiods that I'm aware off. Might be missing something there but thats my line of thought.