Where are all the thousands that have been SCAMMED….It may that they want no part of replies like these….
[bg=http://forum.treasurenet.com/images/coinsc.jpg]No doubt items have been found, but do you know how they were found? Have you bothererd to think about the use of an LRL as it relates to an actual find? It's a matter of thinking the LRL has pointed you to the base of a nice old tree, and then breaking out the metal detector to "pinpoint" your target.
Tom in CA has developed an excellent expiriment that has yet to be attempted. Take an old tennis shoe and smear it in peanut butter. Close your eyes and toss that shoe into the air. Where it lands, break out the detector and try to "pinpoint" what the tennis shoe is trying to tell you is buried there. If you believe that an LRL can do then, then you might as well save a few bucks and try the shoe idea.
Quote
ple statistical odds say that these things will occasionally have a hit.
What has the fact that LRLs will locate gold have to with Statistical odds

?Art
This has been explained to you multiple times Art, but it's apparent you still can't "do the math," so to speak.
You do realize that just because you posted a question looking for people that have been scammed doesn't mean that all people unhappy with their LRLs are registered on Treasurenet to respond, or even saw this thread to post on it in the first place?
And why is it that none of you LRL fans have bothered to address the big, red bold paragraph at the top of the new LRL page? You're in here still refusing to provide any kind of evidence that these LRLs do as you claim, when the entire point of this forum even existing is so that people won't get scammed by buying one of these "devices."
So far all I've seen from the LRL group is just more rhetoric having nothing to do with how these devices actually work. I'd think certain people here would be working much more diligently to make a case for these things.
Sooooo, what you're saying is that it's not logical to think you'll find gold when you go to your gold fields? Would it be more logical to say that you'll probably dig up Buicks all day, but then you get the nice suprise of gold once in awhile?
Hence, you know there is gold there....known gold.....
Here's another question you've never bothered to answer. Are you able to tell how much gold is in the dirt you dig out of a particular hole, and how deep was that gold, before you dig it

Have you ever tried the experiment I suggested? Close you eyes and toss a rock as far as you can into your gold field, then dig a hole there and process it later, then compare that gold to the amount of gold you get from a dowsed hole? You'd be surprised by the results, I can guarantee it.
It most certainly does need an answer. Just 3 posts back you wrote that I have no Treasure Hunting logic because I've explained to you that going to a gold field to hunt for gold isn't hunting at all, it's just digging. Since you seem to think this is illogical, you need to explain yourself.
I was referring to known gold, just like I said. Known targets are targets you bury yourself and then "find" later, and then try to use as proof that your little devices work. Known gold is gold you already know to be in a particular area, without doing any searching.
It defies only the logic of those who do not posess it. I am referring to random chance in a roundabout way. What I want you to see is that the micro-gold you rely on your rods so much to find is most likely everywhere in your gold fields. Hence my proposal. And you're right in saying it has very little to do with treasure hunting as looking for gold in a gold field is a bit like looking for a puppy in a pet store.
Of course you don't understand what I'm telling you. I've mentioned over and over that your "logic" is quite askew to what a normal person realizes as logic.
So, you don't understand analogies, you don't understand random chance, you don't understand physics, you don't understand the word "opinion," you don't understand experimentation, you don't understand mathematics......
I never claimed that my methods were better or worse than anyone else's, Art. You really need to start make-believeing in your own head, instead of in public places.
But I'll give you an answer. I use a metal detector because I've never claimed to be able to find pounds of gold with coat hangers.
Not to mention the fact that you started this thread to discuss people that have been scammed, not about using LRLs for treasure hunting. You know, it might be helpful for you to read the title of the thread and a few of the posts so you'll be on the right track before you bother to write anything.
Try this one on for size, Art. I'll bet it fits you: "I drive a blue car, so that means elephants in China have have two ears!"
Wow, Art, I think you just stumbled onto the answer for everything!
The oil crisis: "If I go for a jog next week, then all cars will be powered by giggles and sunshine!"
Health Care: "Since I dressed myself today, that must mean everyone's doctor visits are free now!"
And this.....The only people on this thread that have been Scammed are the people who know that LRL’s are good treasure hunting tools and the ones who want to learn something.....is just freaking hilarious, but I'm glad you're finally able to admit that you and Dell have been scammed.[/bg]