Tool?

canamrider

Jr. Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
34
Reaction score
30
Golden Thread
0
Location
W
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • DSCN2020.webp
    DSCN2020.webp
    641.2 KB · Views: 167
  • DSCN2021.webp
    DSCN2021.webp
    435.3 KB · Views: 152
  • DSCN2022.webp
    DSCN2022.webp
    508.4 KB · Views: 147
  • DSCN2023.webp
    DSCN2023.webp
    453.2 KB · Views: 144
  • DSCN2024.webp
    DSCN2024.webp
    519.7 KB · Views: 131
Upvote 0
Looks like a piece of an ax...keep looking around in this area.
 

no ax keep looking if you were to try and chop with it it looks like it would crumble into pieces, just a natural rock in a nice shape
 

Funny I saw a couple like this today myself...they do catch your eye, but I think they are broken by cattle/ horses. Possible where you are?
 

no ax keep looking if you were to try and chop with it it looks like it would crumble into pieces, just a natural rock in a nice shape

Nope, disagree....
 

Why do you keep harping about it?? We can agree to disagree.....
 

T.C. no offense but you sure don't seem to bring much to the table in these forum discussions.

CanAmRider the sandstone material isn't well suited for Native American tools. It would have probably broke into pieces the first time it were used as an ax or a hammer. I agree it has the shape of a possible tool but they definitely would have chosen a different type of stone when crafting it.
 

But one thing sandstone was definitely used for ( or most any porus stone with a rough surface ) is a sanding tool or smoothing tool. A shaft abrader would have been made from the same or similar material and would have been used to sand & smooth arrow shafts. The 2nd picture shows what appears to be a slight groove running down the center of it consistent with what a shaft abrading stone might have. Please post a few more pictures of that groove when you get a chance
 

Enlarging the 2nd and 3rd photo to the max, what would have been the bit, if it were an axe, is rounded, not sharp. But it does not show any usage wear that would explain the rounded aspect if it were simply a bit made blunt by usage. Further, examining those two photos does not show evidence that it was ground into shape in the unbroken, smooth areas. I would have to conclude that it is a broken rock up to this point, pending photos that might suggest it is more then a broken rock....
 

T.C. no offense but you sure don't seem to bring much to the table in these forum discussions.

CanAmRider the sandstone material isn't well suited for Native American tools. It would have probably broke into pieces the first time it were used as an ax or a hammer. I agree it has the shape of a possible tool but they definitely would have chosen a different type of stone when crafting it.

No offense, mn9000, but I just express my opinion. Opinions are like anal cavities, everybody has one. I don't try to berate other people's opinions. I didn't read anything stating the piece in question was sandstone.
 

Enlarging the 2nd and 3rd photo to the max, what would have been the bit, if it were an axe, is rounded, not sharp. But it does not show any usage wear that would explain the rounded aspect if it were simply a bit made blunt by usage. Further, examining those two photos does not show evidence that it was ground into shape in the unbroken, smooth areas. I would have to conclude that it is a broken rock up to this point, pending photos that might suggest it is more then a broken rock....

I respect your opinion, Charl....
 

I'm with you Rock.Nothing here says axe!
 

It looks like sandstone, which wouldnt make a good axe head. But you're in Texas so keep looking and youll find great stuff for sure. Lots of amazing stuff has been found in Texas.
 

I have a broken Celt the pole end made of sandstone but as you can see its polished very well. I found it myself in a field. If they ever turn the field again I hope to find the other half.
 

Attachments

  • SDC11593.webp
    SDC11593.webp
    357.9 KB · Views: 86
  • SDC11594.webp
    SDC11594.webp
    375.3 KB · Views: 109
  • SDC11595.webp
    SDC11595.webp
    335.2 KB · Views: 84
Hmmm.

Rock, no offense but I'm not seeing a celt portion any more than I am seeing an ax bit in the start of this thread. Celts were made of a good hard stone as far as I know, not a sandstone.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom