insontis
Hero Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 816
- Reaction score
- 462
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Blue Springs, MO
- Detector(s) used
- Garret AT Pro
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #21
Thread Owner
Alright - so! Let me start off by saying I received the lot today. Going by the pictures and what they claimed each metal was, I would have spent about spot price or less on this lot. Note that I said "what they claimed" and "would have". The broken ring weighs 4 grams (I expected it to be smaller, more dainty), which is double what I accounted the gold to weigh total by itself - the other "gold" combined weighs 3 grams. The total "silver" weighs over 160-170 grams. So by eyeballing, I was justified in purchasing this even based off of scrap (let alone resale value). Adds a bit back to my confidence that I wasn't crazy as I thought for taking a shot.
Now for the bad news. Well as I said above - that was assuming everything that they claimed was silver was silver, and gold was gold. Turns out that isn't exactly the case. In the gold photo - the first one - there is a small ball stud earring behind the ring - didn't know a piece this small could hit a magnet so hard. The ring? When turned to the reverse you can see where the plated layer remains and where the edges are discolored. Green bubbly acid on the edges. As for the "silver"... the thick bangle bracelet is an unknown so far. The thin bangle around the rings is clearly magnetic and unmarked, the camera charm on the chain (not the chain) is costume. The tiger's eye bracelet isn't even gold-filled, let alone vermeil - costume. But the most crushing error is that the belt buckle - which was to be most likely the most valuable piece is marked NICKEL SILVER. For those who don't know, this is another phrase for junk. All of the rings check out as well as the rest of the bracelets and most of the earrings.
Where this leaves me now is a renegotiation with the seller. I've initiated contact and have let him know of the pending situation and that I'd get back with the results of the remaining unknown pieces. They said they'd "be willing to work with a little". Given that a few of the "nicer" pieces that I was really relying on being genuine are not.. hopefully they'd work with me more than a little. If not, a return is inevitable. Hopefully with the education I provide they'll understand more so the value of what they have going forward.
Now for the bad news. Well as I said above - that was assuming everything that they claimed was silver was silver, and gold was gold. Turns out that isn't exactly the case. In the gold photo - the first one - there is a small ball stud earring behind the ring - didn't know a piece this small could hit a magnet so hard. The ring? When turned to the reverse you can see where the plated layer remains and where the edges are discolored. Green bubbly acid on the edges. As for the "silver"... the thick bangle bracelet is an unknown so far. The thin bangle around the rings is clearly magnetic and unmarked, the camera charm on the chain (not the chain) is costume. The tiger's eye bracelet isn't even gold-filled, let alone vermeil - costume. But the most crushing error is that the belt buckle - which was to be most likely the most valuable piece is marked NICKEL SILVER. For those who don't know, this is another phrase for junk. All of the rings check out as well as the rest of the bracelets and most of the earrings.
Where this leaves me now is a renegotiation with the seller. I've initiated contact and have let him know of the pending situation and that I'd get back with the results of the remaining unknown pieces. They said they'd "be willing to work with a little". Given that a few of the "nicer" pieces that I was really relying on being genuine are not.. hopefully they'd work with me more than a little. If not, a return is inevitable. Hopefully with the education I provide they'll understand more so the value of what they have going forward.