What's new

Where some of the sand comes from.

Dirt Fishin Dale

Hero Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
799
Reaction score
17
Golden Thread
0
Detector(s) used
Minelab E-Trac, Excal 1000, Binford 5000 super hunter
This was in a paper in the Palm Beach area.

Sand mine holds ancient fossils
By Anthony Westbury
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Some days there's no knowing which direction life will take you. Occasionally that's a very good thing.
That was the case Wednesday when I drove to St. Lucie West to interview a gentleman who's been digging up ancient shells and fossils right in his neighborhood.
John Brown, 81, jokingly refers to himself as a "senile scavenger."
"I've been digging things up for 70 years," he says with a big smile.
Most of that was in New Jersey, where Brown prowled the beaches with his metal detector. He shows off a series of driftwood panels adorned with hundreds of found items ranging from class rings to gold teeth.
Lately, Brown has become fascinated by old shells and the occasional fossil bones he's excavated near his Kings Isle home. "It's amazing to me that we're walking on stuff that's millions of years old," he marvels, holding up a black mastodon tooth the size of a small orange.
And recently, he tells me, he's discovered a mother lode of fossils in northern St. Lucie County. Would I like to see it? We hit I-95.
Trouble is, the shells and fossils are actually on private property, Brown warns me. Turns out, it's very private indeed — as in a very active rock mine with huge trucks kicking up clouds of dust and threatening to mow us down.
No sooner do we spot a small mound of shells and Brown delightedly exits his car, than a man in white pickup truck slides to a halt.
Rick Stewart turns out to be the CEO of the mine. He listens patiently to our explanations of why we're technically trespassing. But he also offers me a quick guided tour of what's going on with all those piles of rock and sand and shells.
There's some irony here, it turns out.
Stewart Mining Industries is digging down about 45 feet in 15-foot-deep layers. Huge trucks cart off the top layer of sand and silt. Lower down there's coquina rock, composed of thousands of tiny seashells, which is used for road bases, Stewart tells me. The lowest layer, at least a million years old, includes the shells and fossils Brown is lusting after.
This material is the remains of an ancient shoreline, Stewart tells me. Prehistoric dunes from the Pleistocene era ran north-south here, about a dozen miles inland from today's beaches. There are 25-foot high piles containing millions of whelk and conch shells, and considerably fewer dark lumps. Those are ancient fossilized bones, including the mastodon teeth and even the remains of ancient trees.
Stewart explains the irony. The top layer of sand, once it's graded and screened to remove the largest lumps, is busily being trucked out to replenish beaches in Indian River, St. Lucie and Palm Beach counties. I guess you could call that the ultimate act of recycling. Life's a beach, over and over again.
Stewart smiles when I ask if he's in favor of beach renourishment. "Let's just say it's not bad for business," he concedes.
We returned to Mr. Brown with a bucketful of shells and fossils. He wants to know if the company ever allows schoolkids to visit. Stewart explains the safety issues involved in running a mine. But, yes, he would consider allowing field trips if they could be prearranged.
I hope they can work out some trips like that. Brown is right, it is pretty neat bouncing up and down in the palm of your hand things older than dinosaurs.
Older than dirt, too, I guess.
 
Upvote 0
It's not really "beach sand", but ocean bottom material. This is the basic problem..articles like this perpetuate the myth that any old material that was once wet is beach material. It's just plain dirt..dirt contaminated with "fines" that pollute the longshore high energy zone. Ever notice that milky crap in the surf? That's SILT from the renourished beaches.

Yes, it is a treasure trove of ancient skeletal deposits, but it ain't decent beach material! Good article, but misleading.
 
billinstuart said:
It's not really "beach sand", but ocean bottom material. This is the basic problem..articles like this perpetuate the myth that any old material that was once wet is beach material. It's just plain dirt..dirt contaminated with "fines" that pollute the longshore high energy zone. Ever notice that milky crap in the surf? That's SILT from the renourished beaches.

Yes, it is a treasure trove of ancient skeletal deposits, but it ain't decent beach material! Good article, but misleading.

My thoughts exactly.
 
Has anyone noticed that the beaches that get the new sand are void of sand fleas and other crustaceans? The beaches in the New Smyrna area had sand added and there's been a discusting blackish gray mud at the waters edge ever sense. I truly find it appalling that we pay for this distruction of what mother nature naturally wants to do. Leave the beaches alone, and let the sea do what it does.
 
That's because it's not "beach sand". True beach sand is actually smooth under a microscope, and pretty consistent in grain size. The CRAP they place on the beaches is rough and contains alot of "fines", really small particles that stay suspended in the water column and pack like concrete. It's these "fines" that cause the mud appearance. It's the lousy sand consistency that deters sand fleas.

Frankly, I am disgusted with the talent of our taxpayer paid "coastal engineers". With all the knowledge available locally, these Luddites plod along the path of self righteousness totally oblivious to the facts. Mother Nature, deliver us from these imbeciles.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom