wisconsinwalter
Jr. Member
- #1
Thread Owner
Just so you guys and gals in WI know why this happened, it was not because of Lake Delton. The state does not own any impoundment. It is because the state feels it is loosing cultural items to detectorists and want it to stop.
It is not a law but an admin DNR rule.
We have lost the rights because the DNR ARch has bowed to the State Arch. The DNR arch was the MN State Arch until he left his position under fire and came to WI. This is all public! Google Mark Dudzik.
John Broihahn is a preservationist and has tried to get detecting banned on DNR lands for years. The DNR would not allow the ban until Dudzik snuck it in. How do I know? The three major clubs in the state have paid for a lobbyist. This info was gained by an open record request we requested. Now when the old DNR arch left it opened the door for the preservationist Broihahn to get the equally liberal Dudzik to agree. They believe that all materials belong to the state and the state is a repository of items for them and them only. They went as far as to say in the meeting that they would prefer the stuff to rot in the ground or be lost to urbanization forever if they can't get it.
In some previous posts about the subject, some have expressed outrage about it. I feel outrage that the few are paying for the many in that we are paying the bill to get your rights backs. Please consider buying raffle tickets from the FMDAC or Gene Scullion at Badger detectors or Teri Otto at Outdoor Outfitters. We are close to being out of money after $4000 invested. The lobbyist has drawn a plan and is trying to implement it, but we need more help to be able to pay.
So please consider helping instead of complaining
It is not a law but an admin DNR rule.
We have lost the rights because the DNR ARch has bowed to the State Arch. The DNR arch was the MN State Arch until he left his position under fire and came to WI. This is all public! Google Mark Dudzik.
John Broihahn is a preservationist and has tried to get detecting banned on DNR lands for years. The DNR would not allow the ban until Dudzik snuck it in. How do I know? The three major clubs in the state have paid for a lobbyist. This info was gained by an open record request we requested. Now when the old DNR arch left it opened the door for the preservationist Broihahn to get the equally liberal Dudzik to agree. They believe that all materials belong to the state and the state is a repository of items for them and them only. They went as far as to say in the meeting that they would prefer the stuff to rot in the ground or be lost to urbanization forever if they can't get it.
In some previous posts about the subject, some have expressed outrage about it. I feel outrage that the few are paying for the many in that we are paying the bill to get your rights backs. Please consider buying raffle tickets from the FMDAC or Gene Scullion at Badger detectors or Teri Otto at Outdoor Outfitters. We are close to being out of money after $4000 invested. The lobbyist has drawn a plan and is trying to implement it, but we need more help to be able to pay.
So please consider helping instead of complaining